Suppr超能文献

前往急诊科就诊的哮喘患者中后续控制药物不足。

Inadequate follow-up controller medications among patients with asthma who visit the emergency department.

作者信息

Cydulka Rita K, Tamayo-Sarver Joshua H, Wolf Christine, Herrick Erin, Gress Sarah

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;46(4):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.024.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency with which primary care physicians add inhaled corticosteroids to the regimen of asthmatic patients after a visit to the emergency department (ED) among patients not previously prescribed inhaled corticosteroids and to determine the rate at which inhaled corticosteroids prescribed in the ED were continued by primary care physicians.

METHODS

We conducted a structured retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record review of consecutive patients aged 6 to 45 years, treated for acute asthma exacerbation (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 493.00 through 493.99) in the ED during a specified 6-month period, and followed up for 1 year. The patients' first ED visit for asthma exacerbation during the study period was considered the index visit for purposes of this study.

RESULTS

Six hundred twenty-nine patients met study inclusion criteria, 414 of whom were not previously receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy. On ED or hospital discharge, 99 (24%) of these 414 patients were prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid. Of these 99 patients, 37 patients had a primary care follow-up visit within 6 months, with 4 receiving an inhaled corticosteroid dose change and no patients having the inhaled corticosteroids discontinued. Of the 315 patients not prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid on ED or hospital discharge, 128 had a primary care follow-up visit within 6 months, with 32 (25%) patients having an inhaled corticosteroid added to their therapeutic regimen. After primary care follow-up, only 69 (42%) of the 165 patients treated in clinic were receiving an inhaled corticosteroid for control of their asthma. Patients without insurance (odds ratio 0.14; 95% confidence interval 0.027 to 0.71) and patients initially discharged home from the ED (odds ratio 0.17; 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.53) were much less likely to receive inhaled corticosteroids at follow-up on multivariate logistic regression adjusting for race, sex, insurance status, and initial disposition.

CONCLUSION

Primary care physicians infrequently add controller medications (inhaled corticosteroids) at follow-up to the regimen of asthmatic patients after a visit to the ED. Emergency physicians should be encouraged to evaluate chronic asthma burden among patients presenting with exacerbation, educate asthmatic patients, and prescribe controller medications, such as inhaled corticosteroids, for those with persistent symptoms.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在确定在急诊科就诊后,初级保健医生为之前未使用吸入性糖皮质激素的哮喘患者添加吸入性糖皮质激素治疗方案的频率,并确定初级保健医生继续使用急诊科所开吸入性糖皮质激素的比例。

方法

我们进行了一项结构化回顾性队列研究,通过电子病历审查连续6至45岁的患者,这些患者在特定的6个月期间因急性哮喘加重(国际疾病分类第九版编码493.00至493.99)在急诊科接受治疗,并随访1年。本研究将患者在研究期间首次因哮喘加重到急诊科就诊视为索引就诊。

结果

629名患者符合研究纳入标准,其中414名患者之前未接受吸入性糖皮质激素治疗。在急诊科或出院时,这414名患者中有99名(24%)被处方了吸入性糖皮质激素。在这99名患者中,37名患者在6个月内进行了初级保健随访,其中4名患者的吸入性糖皮质激素剂量发生了变化,且没有患者停用吸入性糖皮质激素。在急诊科或出院时未被处方吸入性糖皮质激素的315名患者中,128名患者在6个月内进行了初级保健随访,其中32名(25%)患者在其治疗方案中添加了吸入性糖皮质激素。经过初级保健随访后,在诊所接受治疗的165名患者中,只有69名(42%)患者因控制哮喘而接受吸入性糖皮质激素治疗。在对种族、性别、保险状况和初始处置进行多因素逻辑回归调整后,没有保险的患者(比值比0.14;95%置信区间0.027至0.71)和最初从急诊科出院回家的患者(比值比0.17;95%置信区间0.05至0.53)在随访时接受吸入性糖皮质激素治疗的可能性要小得多。

结论

初级保健医生在患者到急诊科就诊后进行随访时,很少为哮喘患者的治疗方案添加控制药物(吸入性糖皮质激素)。应鼓励急诊医生评估哮喘加重患者的慢性哮喘负担,对哮喘患者进行教育,并为有持续症状的患者处方控制药物,如吸入性糖皮质激素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验