Hamstra-Wright Karrie L, Swanik C Buz, Ennis Theresa Y, Swanik Kathleen A
Department of Kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Aug;35(8):495-501. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.8.495.
STUDY DESIGN: Pretest-posttest matched control group design. OBJECTIVES: To measure passive knee joint stiffness and pain in participants with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) and to determine the relationship between mechanical knee joint stiffness, self-reported stiffness, and pain. BACKGROUND: Patients with PFPS complain of knee joint stiffness and pain, but no research has quantified both of these characteristics in this population. METHODS AND MEASURES: Twenty-eight individuals (14 with PFPS [mean age +/- SD, 25.5 +/- 4.8 years] and 14 healthy controls [mean age +/- SD, 22.8 +/- 5.4 years]) volunteered for this study. Mechanical passive knee joint stiffness was calculated using the damped natural frequency of oscillation of the lower leg while sitting. Mechanical stiffness was compared to self-reports of knee stiffness and pain. All measurements were recorded presitting and after 20 minutes of sitting. RESULTS: Sitting for 20 minutes did not induce significant changes in mechanical knee joint stiffness. However, participants with PFPS reported significantly greater (P<.01) knee stiffness after sitting for 20 minutes. A significant correlation (r = 0.70, P<.01) was found between self-reported stiffness and pain in participants with PFPS; however, no significant relationship was observed between mechanical and self-reported knee joint stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: Despite frequent complaints of joint stiffness, the knees of individuals with PFPS do not appear physiologically stiffer than those of control subjects. Individuals with PFPS perceive increased knee stiffness after sitting, but may misinterpret the sensation of pain as joint stiffness.
研究设计:前后测匹配对照组设计。 目的:测量有和没有髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)的参与者的膝关节被动僵硬程度和疼痛情况,并确定膝关节机械性僵硬、自我报告的僵硬程度与疼痛之间的关系。 背景:PFPS患者抱怨膝关节僵硬和疼痛,但尚无研究对该人群的这两种特征进行量化。 方法与测量:28名个体(14名PFPS患者[平均年龄±标准差,25.5±4.8岁]和14名健康对照者[平均年龄±标准差,22.8±5.4岁])自愿参与本研究。通过测量坐着时小腿摆动的阻尼固有频率来计算膝关节被动机械性僵硬程度。将机械性僵硬程度与膝关节僵硬和疼痛的自我报告进行比较。所有测量均在坐下前和坐下20分钟后记录。 结果:坐20分钟并未引起膝关节机械性僵硬程度的显著变化。然而,PFPS患者在坐20分钟后报告的膝关节僵硬程度显著更高(P<0.01)。在PFPS患者中,自我报告的僵硬程度与疼痛之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.70,P<0.01);然而,未观察到机械性和自我报告的膝关节僵硬程度之间存在显著关系。 结论:尽管PFPS患者经常抱怨关节僵硬,但PFPS患者的膝关节在生理上似乎并不比对照组更僵硬。PFPS患者在坐下后感觉膝关节僵硬加剧,但可能将疼痛感觉误解为关节僵硬。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005-8
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008-10
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005-9
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008-8
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010-5
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012-9
J Man Manip Ther. 2013-11