School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sports Med. 2011 Dec 1;41(12):1019-32. doi: 10.2165/11591470-000000000-00000.
Stiffness, the relationship between applied load and elastic deformation, is an important neuromechanical component related to muscular performance and injury risk. The free-oscillation technique is a popular method for stiffness assessment. There has been wide application of this technique assessing a variety of musculature, including the triceps surae, knee flexors, knee extensors and pectorals. The methodology involves the modelling of the system as a linear damped mass-spring system. The use of such a model has certain advantages and limitations that will be discussed within this review. Perhaps the major advantage of such a model is the specificity of the measure, whereby it is possible for the assessment conditions to simulate the type of loading witnessed during functional tasks and sporting situations. High levels of reliability and construct validity have typically been reported using such procedures. Despite these assurances of accuracy, a number of issues have also been identified. The literature reveals some concerns surrounding the use of a linear model for stiffness assessment. Further, procedural issues surrounding the administration of the perturbation, attention focus of the participant during the perturbation, signal collection, data processing and analysis, presentation of stiffness as a linear or torsional value, assessment load (single vs multiple vs maximal) and the stiffness-load relationship have been identified, and are all fundamentally related to the quality of the calculated output data. Finally, several important considerations for practitioners have been recommended to ensure the quality and consistency of stiffness data collection, processing and interpretation.
僵硬,即施加的负载与弹性变形之间的关系,是与肌肉性能和受伤风险相关的重要神经力学组成部分。自由振动技术是一种评估刚度的常用方法。该技术已广泛应用于评估各种肌肉组织,包括小腿三头肌、膝关节屈肌、膝关节伸肌和胸大肌。该方法将系统建模为线性阻尼质量-弹簧系统。这种模型的使用具有一定的优势和局限性,这将在本综述中进行讨论。这种模型的主要优点之一可能是测量的特异性,即可以根据评估条件模拟在功能任务和运动情况下遇到的加载类型。使用这种程序通常会报告较高的可靠性和结构有效性。尽管有这些准确性的保证,但也发现了一些问题。文献中对使用线性模型进行刚度评估存在一些担忧。此外,还存在与扰动施加、参与者在扰动期间的注意力焦点、信号采集、数据处理和分析、将刚度表示为线性或扭转值、评估负载(单、多或最大)以及刚度-负载关系有关的程序问题,所有这些都与计算输出数据的质量密切相关。最后,为了确保刚度数据收集、处理和解释的质量和一致性,为从业者推荐了一些重要的注意事项。