Crabtree Benjamin F, Miller William L, Tallia Alfred F, Cohen Deborah J, DiCicco-Bloom Barbara, McIlvain Helen E, Aita Virginia A, Scott John G, Gregory Patrice B, Stange Kurt C, McDaniel Reuben R
Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08873, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;3(5):430-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.345.
This study aimed to elucidate how clinical preventive services are delivered in family practices and how this information might inform improvement efforts.
We used a comparative case study design to observe clinical preventive service delivery in 18 purposefully selected Midwestern family medicine offices from 1997 to 1999. Medical records, observation of outpatient encounters, and patient exit cards were used to calculate practice-level rates of delivery of clinical preventive services. Field notes from direct observation of clinical encounters and prolonged observation of the practice and transcripts from in-depth interviews of practice staff and physicians were systematically examined to identify approaches to delivering clinical preventive services recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Practices developed individualized approaches for delivering clinical preventive services, with no one approach being successful across practices. Clinicians acknowledged a 3-fold mission of providing acute care, managing chronic problems, and prevention, but only some made prevention a priority. The clinical encounter was a central focus for preventive service delivery in all practices. Preventive services delivery rates often appeared to be influenced by competing demands within the clinical encounter (including between different preventive services), having a physician champion who prioritized prevention, and economic concerns.
Practice quality improvement efforts that assume there is an optimal approach for delivering clinical preventive services fail to account for practices' propensity to optimize care processes to meet local contexts. Interventions to enhance clinical preventive service delivery should be tailored to meet the local needs of practices and their patient populations.
本研究旨在阐明临床预防服务在家庭医疗实践中是如何提供的,以及这些信息如何为改进工作提供参考。
我们采用比较案例研究设计,于1997年至1999年对18个特意挑选的中西部家庭医学诊所的临床预防服务提供情况进行观察。利用病历、门诊诊疗观察以及患者出院卡来计算诊所层面临床预防服务的提供率。对临床诊疗的直接观察、对诊所的长期观察所做的实地记录,以及对诊所工作人员和医生的深入访谈记录进行系统分析,以确定美国预防服务工作组推荐的临床预防服务提供方法。
各诊所制定了个性化的临床预防服务提供方法,没有一种方法在所有诊所都取得成功。临床医生认可提供急性护理、管理慢性疾病和预防这三项任务,但只有部分医生将预防作为重点。在所有诊所中,临床诊疗都是预防服务提供的核心关注点。预防服务提供率似乎常常受到临床诊疗中相互竞争的需求(包括不同预防服务之间的需求)、有一位将预防作为优先事项的医生支持者以及经济因素的影响。
那些认为存在临床预防服务最佳提供方法的实践质量改进努力,未能考虑到诊所为满足当地情况而优化护理流程的倾向。加强临床预防服务提供的干预措施应根据诊所及其患者群体的当地需求进行调整。