Suppr超能文献

血液透析患者循环血容量标志物的比较

Comparison of markers of circulating blood volume in hemodialysis patients.

作者信息

Morishita Yoshiyuki, Ando Yasuhiro, Ishii Eriko, Arisaka Mayumi, Kusano Eiji

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Jichi Medical School, Minami-Kawachi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Exp Nephrol. 2005 Sep;9(3):233-7. doi: 10.1007/s10157-005-0372-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulse dye-densitometry (PDD) is a newly developed technique for monitoring the arterial concentration of indocyanine green (ICG). By using this method, the circulating blood volume (CBV) can be measured as accurately as by established dilution methods using (131)I-labeled human serum albumin in healthy subjects. In the present study, we estimated the CBV in hemodialysis (HD) patients, using PDD, and compared the utility of this method with that of other markers of the CBV.

METHODS

We measured the CBV in seven HD patients and eight healthy volunteers, using PDD, and evaluated the correlation between the CBV measured by PDD (CBV-PDD) and the calculated CBV (CBV-Cal), using a prediction formula (CBV (l) = 2.68 x BSA, where BSA is body surface area (m(2))). We also investigated the correlation between CBV-PDD and the maximal inferior vena cava diameters in quiet expiration (IVCe), and the plasma levels of atrial and brain natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP, respectively) in the HD patients.

RESULTS

CBV-Cal was closely correlated with CBV-PDD in the healthy volunteers, but there was no such correlation in the HD patients. On the other hand, IVCe was significantly correlated with the CBV-PDD in the healthy volunteers as well as in HD patients. ANP and BNP were not correlated with the CBV-PDD in the HD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that CBV-PDD and IVCe were useful parameters in evaluating the CBV in HD patients, while CBV-Cal was not a useful parameter. Also, as a marker of changes in the CBV in HD patients, IVCe was considered to be more sensitive than either ANP or BNP.

摘要

背景

脉冲染料密度测定法(PDD)是一种新开发的监测吲哚菁绿(ICG)动脉浓度的技术。通过使用该方法,在健康受试者中,循环血容量(CBV)的测量精度可与使用(131)I标记的人血清白蛋白的既定稀释方法相媲美。在本研究中,我们使用PDD评估了血液透析(HD)患者的CBV,并将该方法的效用与其他CBV标志物的效用进行了比较。

方法

我们使用PDD测量了7名HD患者和8名健康志愿者的CBV,并使用预测公式(CBV(升)=2.68×体表面积,其中体表面积以平方米为单位)评估了PDD测量的CBV(CBV-PDD)与计算得出的CBV(CBV-Cal)之间的相关性。我们还研究了HD患者中CBV-PDD与安静呼气时最大下腔静脉直径(IVCe)以及心房和脑钠肽(分别为ANP和BNP)血浆水平之间的相关性。

结果

在健康志愿者中,CBV-Cal与CBV-PDD密切相关,但在HD患者中不存在这种相关性。另一方面,在健康志愿者和HD患者中,IVCe与CBV-PDD均显著相关。在HD患者中,ANP和BNP与CBV-PDD不相关。

结论

我们得出结论,CBV-PDD和IVCe是评估HD患者CBV的有用参数,而CBV-Cal不是有用参数。此外,作为HD患者CBV变化的标志物,IVCe被认为比ANP或BNP更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验