Iijima T, Aoyagi T, Iwao Y, Masuda J, Fuse M, Kobayashi N, Sankawa H
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Monit. 1997 Mar;13(2):81-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007339924083.
Pulse dye-densitometry (PDD) is a newly developed method for monitoring the indocyanine green (ICG) concentration in an artery with which cardiac output (CO) and circulating blood volume (CBV) can be determined. We evaluated its accuracy for clinical use.
In 7 patients under general anesthesia, ICG-sensitive optical probes (805 and 890 nm) were attached to a finger. Following injection of ICG, the arterial concentration of dye was recorded optically by the non-invasive test instrument and sampled arterial blood ICG concentration was also measured photometrically for comparison. In order to validate the PDD analysis, CO was also measured by both the dye dilution cuvette method and by thermodilution in 8 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting. In 30 other patients, CBV assessed by PDD was compared with its value estimated from body size.
The blood dye concentration correlated well with the values obtained by PDD (r = 0.953, p < 0.01). Mean bias for the test PDD CO was +0.15 +/- 0.72 min l-1 (not significant (n.s.)) compared with the cuvette method while the mean bias of the thermodilution method vs the cuvette method was +0.79 +/- 0.84 min l-1 (p < 0.0001.). The average value of CBV obtained by PDD was 3.81 +/- 1.39 L compared with that estimated value, 3.72 +/- 0.77 L (n.s.).
CO determined by PDD agrees well with cuvette densitometry, and somewhat less well with CO by thermodilution. The new method, by not requiring a pulmonary arterial catheter, is less invasive than either older method, and yields in addition a value of CBV.
脉搏染料密度测定法(PDD)是一种新开发的用于监测动脉中吲哚菁绿(ICG)浓度的方法,通过该方法可测定心输出量(CO)和循环血容量(CBV)。我们评估了其临床应用的准确性。
在7例全身麻醉患者中,将ICG敏感光学探头(805和890纳米)附着于手指。注射ICG后,通过无创测试仪器光学记录染料的动脉浓度,并通过光度法测量采集的动脉血ICG浓度以作比较。为验证PDD分析,还对8例计划进行冠状动脉搭桥术的患者采用染料稀释比色法和热稀释法测量CO。在另外30例患者中,将通过PDD评估的CBV与其根据体型估算的值进行比较。
血液染料浓度与PDD获得的值相关性良好(r = 0.953,p < 0.01)。与比色法相比,测试PDD CO的平均偏差为+0.15 +/- 0.72分钟升-1(无显著性差异(n.s.)),而热稀释法与比色法的平均偏差为+0.79 +/- 0.84分钟升-1(p < 0.0001)。PDD获得的CBV平均值为3.81 +/- 1.39升,与估算值3.72 +/- 0.77升相比(无显著性差异)。
通过PDD测定的CO与比色密度测定法结果吻合良好,与热稀释法测定的CO吻合程度稍差。这种新方法无需肺动脉导管,比其他两种方法侵入性更小,此外还能得出CBV值。