Bacon S P, Grantham D W
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-0102.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jun;91(6):3451-5. doi: 10.1121/1.402833.
Modulation detection thresholds (20 log ms) for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) noise were measured in the presence of a SAM noise masker with a modulation depth (mm) of 1.0 and a modulation frequency of 16 or 64 Hz. The signal and masker carriers were presented continuously, and the signal was modulated during one of the two 500-ms observation intervals. The masker was modulated during both observation intervals and, in some conditions, for a certain amount of time before and after signal modulation. The duration of this "fringe" ranged from 62.5 ms to continuous (masker modulated throughout the thresholds estimate). The first experiment showed that a 500-ms fringe could reduce masked thresholds by 4-6 dB, but only at low signal modulation frequencies (2-8 Hz). In the second and third experiments, it was found that the fringe had to have a duration of 500 ms and a depth of about 0.75 to be maximally effective. A final, supplementary experiment indicated that the fringe effect is not due solely to the fringe that occurs prior to the observation intervals. The results are discussed in terms of both peripheral and central auditory processing.
在调制深度(mm)为1.0且调制频率为16或64 Hz的正弦幅度调制(SAM)噪声掩蔽器存在的情况下,测量了正弦幅度调制(SAM)噪声的调制检测阈值(20 log ms)。信号和掩蔽器载波持续呈现,信号在两个500毫秒观察间隔中的一个期间进行调制。掩蔽器在两个观察间隔期间进行调制,并且在某些条件下,在信号调制之前和之后的一定时间内也进行调制。这个“边缘”的持续时间从62.5毫秒到连续(掩蔽器在整个阈值估计期间都进行调制)。第一个实验表明,500毫秒的边缘可以将掩蔽阈值降低4 - 6 dB,但仅在低信号调制频率(2 - 8 Hz)时如此。在第二个和第三个实验中,发现边缘必须具有500毫秒的持续时间和约0.75的深度才能达到最大效果。最后一个补充实验表明,边缘效应并非仅由观察间隔之前出现的边缘引起。从外周和中枢听觉处理的角度对结果进行了讨论。