Gilkey R H, Simpson B D, Weisenberger J M
Signal Detection Laboratory, Central Institute for the Deaf, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Sep;88(3):1323-31. doi: 10.1121/1.399709.
Yost [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78,901-907 (1985)] found that the detectability of a 30-ms dichotic signal (S pi) in a 30-ms diotic noise (No) was not affected by the presence of a 500-ms dichotic forward fringe (N pi). Kollmeier and Gilkey [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 1709-1719, (1990)] performed a somewhat different experiment and varied the onset time of a 25-ms S pi signal in a 750-ms noise that switched, after 375-ms, from N pi to No. In contrast to Yost, they found that the N pi segment of the noise reduced the detectability of the signal even when the signal was temporally delayed well into the No segment of the noise and suggested that the N pi segment of noise acted as a forward masker. To resolve this apparent conflict, the present study investigated the detectability of a brief S pi signal in the presence of an No masker of the same duration as the signal. The masker was preceded by quiet or an N pi forward fringe and followed by quiet, an No, or N pi backward fringe. The present study differs from most previous studies of the effects of the masker fringe in that the onset time of the signal was systematically varied to examine how masking changes during the time course of the complex fringe-masker-fringe stimulus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
约斯特[《美国声学学会杂志》78, 901 - 907 (1985)]发现,在30毫秒的双耳噪声(No)中,30毫秒的双耳信号(S pi)的可检测性不受500毫秒双耳前向边缘(N pi)的影响。科尔迈尔和吉尔基[《美国声学学会杂志》87, 1709 - 1719, (1990)]进行了一个稍有不同的实验,在一个750毫秒的噪声中改变25毫秒S pi信号的起始时间,该噪声在375毫秒后从N pi切换到No。与约斯特的研究相反,他们发现即使信号在时间上延迟到噪声的No部分,噪声的N pi部分也会降低信号的可检测性,并表明噪声的N pi部分起到了前向掩蔽器的作用。为了解决这一明显的冲突,本研究调查了在与信号持续时间相同的No掩蔽器存在的情况下,短暂S pi信号的可检测性。掩蔽器之前是安静或N pi前向边缘,之后是安静、No或N pi后向边缘。本研究与以往大多数关于掩蔽器边缘效应的研究不同之处在于,系统地改变了信号的起始时间,以研究在复杂的边缘 - 掩蔽器 - 边缘刺激的时间过程中掩蔽是如何变化的。(摘要截短于250字)