Cashdollar Jennifer L, Dahling Daniel R
Biohazard Assessment Research Branch, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., MS-320, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.
J Virol Methods. 2006 Mar;132(1-2):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.08.016. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
Electropositively charged filters are frequently used for concentrating enteric viruses from large volumes of water. A major disadvantage to the use of these filters, however, is that they are not cost-effective. At US$ 150-180 per filter, routine viral monitoring of water is cost-prohibitive. This study describes the development of a method which allows a filter to be used up to three times, achieving comparable recoveries to new filters. Zetapor 1MDS and N66 Posidyne electropositive filters were tested. The method was analyzed using tap water and Ohio River water that was spiked with poliovirus. Tap water recoveries averaged 32% for new filters, 30% for filters used twice, and 38% for filters used three times. River water recoveries averaged 68% for new filters, 83% for filters used twice, and 100% for filters used three times. RT-PCR and dot-blot hybridization were performed on sample concentrates to ensure that all viral nucleic acid from the previous test had been removed from the filters by the treatment process.
带正电的过滤器经常用于从大量水中浓缩肠道病毒。然而,使用这些过滤器的一个主要缺点是它们不具有成本效益。每个过滤器价格在150 - 180美元,对水进行常规病毒监测成本过高。本研究描述了一种方法的开发,该方法可使过滤器使用多达三次,回收率与新过滤器相当。对Zetapor 1MDS和N66 Posidyne带正电过滤器进行了测试。使用加有脊髓灰质炎病毒的自来水和俄亥俄河水对该方法进行分析。新过滤器对自来水的回收率平均为32%,使用两次的过滤器为30%,使用三次的过滤器为38%。新过滤器对河水的回收率平均为68%,使用两次的过滤器为83%,使用三次的过滤器为100%。对样品浓缩物进行逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和斑点杂交,以确保处理过程已从过滤器中去除了上次测试的所有病毒核酸。