Suppr超能文献

新方法使用带正电荷的微孔过滤器和超滤法从自来水中浓缩病毒。

New method using a positively charged microporous filter and ultrafiltration for concentration of viruses from tap water.

机构信息

Department of Soil, Water & Environmental Science, Building 38, Room 429, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(10):3500-6. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02705-10. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

Abstract

The methods used to concentrate enteric viruses from water have remained largely unchanged for nearly 30 years, with the most common technique being the use of 1MDS Virozorb filters followed by organic flocculation for secondary concentration. Recently, a few studies have investigated alternatives; however, many of these methods are impractical for use in the field or share some of the limitations of this traditional method. In the present study, the NanoCeram virus sampler, an electropositive pleated microporous filter composed of microglass filaments coated with nanoalumina fibers, was evaluated. Test viruses were first concentrated by passage of 20 liters of seeded water through the filter (average filter retention efficiency was ≥ 99.8%), and then the viruses were recovered using various salt-based or proteinaceous eluting solutions. A 1.0% sodium polyphosphate solution with 0.05 M glycine was determined to be the most effective. The recovered viruses were then further concentrated using Centricon Plus-70 centrifugal ultrafilters to a final volume of 3.3 (±0.3 [standard deviation]) ml; this volume compares quite favorably to that of previously described methods, such as organic flocculation (~15 to 40 ml). The overall virus recovery efficiencies were 66% for poliovirus 1, 83% for echovirus 1, 77% for coxsackievirus B5, 14% for adenovirus 2, and 56% for MS2 coliphage. In addition, this method appears to be compatible with both cell culture and PCR assays. This new approach for the recovery of viruses from water is therefore a viable alternative to currently used methods when small volumes of final concentrate are an advantage.

摘要

用于从水中浓缩肠病毒的方法近 30 年来基本保持不变,最常用的技术是使用 1MDS Virozorb 过滤器,然后进行有机絮凝进行二次浓缩。最近,有一些研究调查了替代方法;然而,许多这些方法在现场使用不切实际,或者具有这种传统方法的一些局限性。在本研究中,评估了 NanoCeram 病毒采样器,这是一种由涂有纳米氧化铝纤维的微玻璃纤维组成的正电褶状微孔过滤器。首先,将 20 升接种水通过过滤器来浓缩测试病毒(平均过滤器保留效率≥99.8%),然后使用各种盐基或蛋白质洗脱液回收病毒。确定 1.0%的多磷酸钠溶液与 0.05 M 甘氨酸的组合是最有效的。然后使用 Centricon Plus-70 离心超滤器将回收的病毒进一步浓缩至最终体积 3.3(±0.3 [标准差])ml;与以前描述的方法(如有机絮凝(~15 至 40 ml))相比,这个体积相当有利。脊髓灰质炎病毒 1 的病毒总回收率为 66%,肠道病毒 1 为 83%,柯萨奇病毒 B5 为 77%,腺病毒 2 为 14%,MS2 噬菌体为 56%。此外,该方法似乎与细胞培养和 PCR 检测都兼容。因此,当需要小体积最终浓缩物时,这种从水中回收病毒的新方法是目前使用的方法的可行替代方法。

相似文献

6
Concentration and recovery of viruses from water: a comprehensive review.从水中浓缩和回收病毒:全面综述。
Food Environ Virol. 2012 Jun;4(2):41-67. doi: 10.1007/s12560-012-9080-2. Epub 2012 May 31.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Determination of Ct values for chlorine of resistant enteroviruses.耐氯肠道病毒氯含量的Ct值测定。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2009 Mar;44(4):336-9. doi: 10.1080/10934520802659653.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验