Lundqvist Carolina, Hassmén Peter
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
J Sports Sci. 2005 Jul;23(7):727-36. doi: 10.1080/02640410400021484.
The Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) is one of the most frequently used instruments when assessing competitive state anxiety in sport psychology research. However, doubts have been expressed about the factorial validity of both the English and the Greek versions of the scale. Hence, a revised version of the inventory (CSAI-2R) has recently been suggested to be more psychometrically sound (Cox et al., 2003). In the present study, the aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the CSAI-2 using confirmatory factor analyses. A total of 969 athletes (571 men and 398 women) competing in 26 different sports completed the Swedish version of the CSAI-2. Three different factor structures were evaluated: the original three-factor model (with cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety and self-confidence), a two-factor model in which self-confidence was excluded, and a three-factor model containing 17 items (CSAI-2R). The results revealed that only the 17-item model displayed an acceptable fit to the data. Although some doubts remain about the amount of variance that can be attributed to error variance in the subscales, the results suggest that it is better to use the CSAI-2R rather than the original CSAI-2.
竞争状态焦虑量表-2(CSAI-2)是运动心理学研究中评估竞争状态焦虑时最常用的工具之一。然而,该量表的英文和希腊文版本的因子效度受到了质疑。因此,最近有人提出修订版量表(CSAI-2R)在心理测量学上更合理(考克斯等人,2003年)。在本研究中,目的是通过验证性因素分析来评估瑞典语版CSAI-2的心理测量特性。共有969名参加26项不同运动的运动员完成了瑞典语版的CSAI-2(其中571名男性,398名女性)。评估了三种不同的因素结构:原始的三因素模型(包括认知焦虑、躯体焦虑和自信)、排除自信的两因素模型以及包含17个条目的三因素模型(CSAI-2R)。结果显示,只有17条目模型对数据呈现出可接受的拟合度。尽管对于分量表中可归因于误差方差的方差量仍存在一些疑问,但结果表明使用CSAI-2R比原始的CSAI-2更好。