Butler Lorna, Degner Lesley, Baile Walter, Landry M
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3J5.
Psychooncology. 2005 Oct;14(10):861-72; discussion 873-4. doi: 10.1002/pon.948.
We conducted a critical interpretive analysis of 47 studies from the Cochrane Review of the communications training literature to capture the empirical indicators used to judge provider communication competency and to describe how the indicators were characterized in the context of a cancer care system. Of the 47 studies reviewed, few showed any resemblance to recommendations from two international consensus conferences of experts in the communication research field. Some of the challenges in moving forward with cancer-related communication skills involve deciding what we want people to learn, providing learning across various experiences, identifying learning models, and finding alternate ways of motivating people to learn. Once core competencies are clearly articulated, we can determine the best approaches for developing cancer-specific training programs.
我们对Cochrane关于沟通培训文献综述中的47项研究进行了批判性解释分析，以获取用于评判医疗服务提供者沟通能力的实证指标，并描述这些指标在癌症护理系统背景下的特征。在所审查的47项研究中，很少有与沟通研究领域两次国际专家共识会议的建议有相似之处的。推进与癌症相关的沟通技能面临的一些挑战包括决定我们希望人们学习什么、提供跨各种体验的学习、确定学习模式以及找到激励人们学习的替代方法。一旦明确阐述了核心能力，我们就可以确定开发癌症特定培训项目的最佳方法。
