Green Carmen R, Ndao-Brumblay S Khady, West Brady, Washington Tamika
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0048, USA.
J Pain. 2005 Oct;6(10):689-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.06.002.
Little is known about physical barriers to adequate pain treatment for minorities. This investigation explored sociodemographic determinants of pain medication availability in Michigan pharmacies. A cross-sectional survey-based study with census data and data provided by Michigan community retail pharmacists was designed. Sufficient opioid analgesic supplies was defined as stocking at least one long-acting, short-acting, and combination opioid analgesic. Pharmacies located in minority (<or=70% minority residents) and white (>or=70% white residents) zip code areas were randomly selected by using a 2-stage sampling selection process (response rate, 80%). For the 190 pharmacies surveyed, most were located in white areas (51.6%) and had sufficient supplies (84.1%). After accounting for zip code median age and stratifying by income, pharmacies in white areas (odds ratio, 13.36 high income vs 54.42 low income) and noncorporate pharmacies (odds ratio, 24.92 high income vs 3.61 low income) were more likely to have sufficient opioid analgesic supplies (P < .005). Racial differences in the odds of having a sufficient supply were significantly higher in low income areas when compared with high income areas. Having a pharmacy located near a hospital did not change the availability for opioid analgesics. Persons living in predominantly minority areas experienced significant barriers to accessing pain medication, with greater disparities in low income areas regardless of ethnic composition. Differences were also found on the basis of pharmacy type, suggesting variability in pharmacist's decision making.
Michigan pharmacies in minority zip codes were 52 times less likely to carry sufficient opioid analgesics than pharmacies in white zip codes regardless of income. Lower income areas and corporate pharmacies were less likely to carry sufficient opioid analgesics. This study illustrates barriers to pain care and has public health implications.
关于少数群体获得充分疼痛治疗的身体障碍,我们所知甚少。本调查探讨了密歇根州药店中疼痛药物可及性的社会人口学决定因素。设计了一项基于横断面调查的研究,使用人口普查数据以及密歇根州社区零售药剂师提供的数据。充足的阿片类镇痛药供应被定义为库存至少一种长效、短效和复方阿片类镇痛药。通过两阶段抽样选择过程,随机选择位于少数族裔(少数族裔居民占比≤70%)和白人(白人居民占比≥70%)邮政编码区域的药店(回复率为80%)。在接受调查的190家药店中,大多数位于白人区域(51.6%)且有充足的供应(84.1%)。在考虑邮政编码区域的年龄中位数并按收入分层后,白人区域的药店(优势比,高收入为13.36,低收入为54.42)和非连锁药店(优势比,高收入为24.92,低收入为3.61)更有可能有充足的阿片类镇痛药供应(P <.005)。与高收入地区相比,低收入地区在有充足供应的几率上的种族差异显著更高。在医院附近有药店并不会改变阿片类镇痛药的可及性。生活在主要为少数族裔地区的人在获取疼痛药物方面面临重大障碍,无论种族构成如何,低收入地区的差距更大。在药店类型方面也发现了差异,这表明药剂师的决策存在差异。
无论收入如何,密歇根州少数族裔邮政编码区域的药店携带充足阿片类镇痛药的可能性比白人邮政编码区域的药店低52倍。低收入地区和连锁药店携带充足阿片类镇痛药的可能性较小。本研究说明了疼痛护理的障碍,并具有公共卫生意义。