Richmond R, Heather N, Holt P
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, and School of Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1996 Dec;15(4):377-83. doi: 10.1080/09595239600186141.
In a telephone survey of 455 of the top 600 companies in Australia, around three-quarters reported the existence of restrictions on both smoking and alcohol in the workplace. Forty-six percent of companies had a total ban on smoking at work, 31% had designated limited areas where employees were permitted to smoke, and 23% had no policy on smoking. Seventy-seven percent of companies encouraged a total alcohol-free work environment. The larger the company, the more likely it was to have restrictions on smoking in the work-place, but there was no relationship between the size of the company and alcohol restrictions. Government organizations were more likely to have restrictions on smoking than non-government organizations, but this difference was not apparent for alcohol restrictions. The major reasons given for smoking restrictions were related to health and comfort, while those for alcohol were related to work productivity and safety.
在对澳大利亚600家顶尖公司中的455家进行的电话调查中,约四分之三的公司报告称工作场所对吸烟和饮酒都有限制。46%的公司完全禁止在工作场所吸烟,31%划定了有限的区域供员工吸烟,23%没有关于吸烟的政策。77%的公司鼓励营造完全无酒精的工作环境。公司规模越大,在工作场所对吸烟进行限制的可能性就越大,但公司规模与饮酒限制之间没有关联。政府组织比非政府组织更有可能对吸烟进行限制,但在饮酒限制方面这种差异并不明显。实施吸烟限制的主要原因与健康和舒适度有关,而实施饮酒限制的原因则与工作效率和安全有关。