Hurwitz Eric L, Morgenstern Hal, Yu Fei
Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2121-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000180639.67008.d0.
Observational study conducted within a randomized clinical trial.
The objective of this study is to estimate the effects of patient satisfaction on subsequent changes in pain and disability among low back pain patients randomized to chiropractic or medical care in a managed-care practice setting.
Recent studies of low back pain treatments have shown chiropractic patients to be more satisfied with their care than medical patients. However, little is known about the relation between patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.
A total of 681 low back pain patients presenting to three southern California healthcare clinics and screened for serious spinal pathology and contraindications were randomized to medical care with and without physical therapy, and chiropractic care with and without physical modalities, and followed for 18 months. Satisfaction with back care was measured on a 40-point scale and observed at 4 weeks following randomization. The primary outcome variables, observed between 6 weeks and 18 months of follow-up, are average and most severe low back pain intensity in the past week, assessed with 0 to 10 numerical rating scales, low back-related disability, assessed with the 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and remission from clinically meaningful pain and disability. Perceived change in low back symptoms was a secondary outcome.
Greater satisfaction increased the odds of remission from clinically meaningful pain and disability at 6 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for 10-point increase in satisfaction = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.99, 2.68), but not at 6, 12, or 18 months (6 months: adjusted OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.52; 12 months: adjusted OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.67, 1.32; 18 months: adjusted OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.76, 1.50). Perception of improvement was greater among highly satisfied than less satisfied patients throughout the 18-month follow-up period. The estimated effects of satisfaction on clinical outcomes were similar for medical and chiropractic patients.
Patient satisfaction may confer small short-term clinical benefits for low back pain patients. Long-term perceived improvement may reflect, in part, perceived past improvement as measured by satisfaction.
在一项随机临床试验中进行的观察性研究。
本研究的目的是评估在管理式医疗实践环境中,随机接受脊椎按摩治疗或医疗护理的腰痛患者的满意度对其后续疼痛和残疾变化的影响。
最近关于腰痛治疗的研究表明,接受脊椎按摩治疗的患者对其治疗的满意度高于接受医疗治疗的患者。然而,关于患者满意度与临床结果之间的关系知之甚少。
共有681名到南加州三家医疗诊所就诊、经筛查排除严重脊柱病变和禁忌证的腰痛患者,被随机分为接受或不接受物理治疗的医疗护理组,以及接受或不接受物理治疗方式的脊椎按摩治疗组,并随访18个月。在随机分组后4周,采用40分制量表测量对背部护理的满意度。在随访的6周和18个月之间观察的主要结局变量包括:过去一周的平均和最严重腰痛强度(采用0至10分数字评分量表评估)、与腰痛相关的残疾(采用24项罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷评估)以及临床上有意义的疼痛和残疾缓解情况。对腰痛症状的感知变化是次要结局。
更高的满意度增加了6周时临床上有意义的疼痛和残疾缓解的几率(满意度每增加10分的调整优势比[OR]=1.61,95%置信区间[CI]=0.99,2.68),但在6个月、12个月或18个月时未增加(6个月:调整OR=1.05,95%CI=0.73,1.52;12个月:调整OR=0.94,95%CI=0.67,1.32;18个月:调整OR=1.07;95%CI=0.76,1.50)。在整个18个月的随访期内,高度满意的患者比不太满意的患者对改善的感知更强。满意度对临床结局的估计影响在接受医疗治疗和脊椎按摩治疗的患者中相似。
患者满意度可能会给腰痛患者带来微小的短期临床益处。长期的感知改善可能部分反映了以满意度衡量的过去的感知改善。