• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一家国民医疗服务门诊诊所中,脊椎按摩疗法管理与疼痛诊所管理对慢性下背痛治疗效果的比较。

A comparison between chiropractic management and pain clinic management for chronic low-back pain in a national health service outpatient clinic.

作者信息

Wilkey Adam, Gregory Michael, Byfield David, McCarthy Peter W

机构信息

Private Practice, Oldham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Jun;14(5):465-73. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0796.

DOI:10.1089/acm.2007.0796
PMID:18564952
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes in perception of pain and disability for a group of patients suffering with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) when managed in a hospital by either a regional pain clinic or a chiropractor.

DESIGN

The study was a pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

The trial was performed at a National Health Service (NHS) hospital outpatient clinic (pain clinic) in the United Kingdom.

SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients with CLBP (i.e., symptom duration of >12 weeks) referred to a regional pain clinic (outpatient hospital clinic) were assessed and randomized to either chiropractic or pain-clinic management for a period of 8 weeks. The study was pragmatic, allowing for normal treatment protocols to be used. Treatment was administered in an NHS hospital setting.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Numerical Rating Scale were used to assess changes in perceived disability and pain. Mean values at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 were calculated. The mean differences between week 0 and week 8 were compared across the two treatment groups using Student's t-tests. Ninety-five percent (95%) confidence intervals (CIs) for the differences between groups were calculated.

RESULTS

Randomization placed 12 patients in the pain clinic and 18 in the chiropractic group, of which 11 and 16, respectively, completed the trial. At 8 weeks, the mean improvement in RMDQ was 5.5 points greater for the chiropractic group (decrease in disability by 5.9) than for the pain-clinic group (0.36) (95% CI 2.0 points to 9.0 points; p = 0.004). Reduction in mean pain intensity at week 8 was 1.8 points greater for the chiropractic group than for the pain-clinic group (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that chiropractic management administered in an NHS setting may be effective for reducing levels of disability and perceived pain during the period of treatment for a subpopulation of patients with CLBP.

摘要

目的

比较一组慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者在医院接受区域疼痛诊所或脊椎按摩师治疗时在疼痛感知和残疾方面的结果。

设计

该研究是一项实用的随机对照试验。

设置

试验在英国一家国民健康服务(NHS)医院门诊诊所(疼痛诊所)进行。

受试者和干预措施

被转诊至区域疼痛诊所(医院门诊诊所)的CLBP患者(即症状持续时间>12周)接受评估,并随机分为脊椎按摩治疗组或疼痛诊所治疗组,为期8周。该研究注重实用性,允许使用常规治疗方案。治疗在NHS医院环境中进行。

结果测量

使用罗兰 - 莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)和数字评分量表来评估感知残疾和疼痛的变化。计算第0、2、4、6和8周的平均值。使用学生t检验比较两个治疗组在第0周和第8周之间的平均差异。计算组间差异的95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

随机分组后,12名患者进入疼痛诊所组,18名患者进入脊椎按摩治疗组,其中分别有11名和16名患者完成试验。在8周时,脊椎按摩治疗组的RMDQ平均改善比疼痛诊所组高5.5分(残疾减少5.9)(95%CI为2.0分至9.0分;p = 0.004)。脊椎按摩治疗组在第8周时的平均疼痛强度降低比疼痛诊所组高1.8分(p = 0.023)。

结论

本研究表明,在NHS环境中进行的脊椎按摩治疗可能对减少CLBP患者亚群在治疗期间的残疾水平和感知疼痛有效。

相似文献

1
A comparison between chiropractic management and pain clinic management for chronic low-back pain in a national health service outpatient clinic.在一家国民医疗服务门诊诊所中,脊椎按摩疗法管理与疼痛诊所管理对慢性下背痛治疗效果的比较。
J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Jun;14(5):465-73. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0796.
2
Chiropractic management of chronic low-back pain: commentary on Wilkey et al.
J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Jun;14(5):451-2. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0080.
3
The Chiropractic Hospital-based Interventions Research Outcomes (CHIRO) study: a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines in the medical and chiropractic management of patients with acute mechanical low back pain.基于脊椎按摩医院的干预研究结果(CHIRO)研究:一项关于临床实践指南在急性机械性腰痛的医疗和脊椎按摩管理中的有效性的随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2010 Dec;10(12):1055-64. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.019.
4
Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial.常规医疗护理加脊骨神经医学治疗与单纯常规医疗护理对美国腰痛士兵疼痛和残疾的影响:一项比较有效性临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 May 18;1(1):e180105. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0105.
5
Satisfaction as a predictor of clinical outcomes among chiropractic and medical patients enrolled in the UCLA low back pain study.在加州大学洛杉矶分校腰痛研究中,脊椎按摩治疗患者和医学患者的满意度作为临床结果的预测指标。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2121-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000180639.67008.d0.
6
A practice-based study of patients with acute and chronic low back pain attending primary care and chiropractic physicians: two-week to 48-month follow-up.一项针对在初级保健和整脊医师处就诊的急慢性腰痛患者的基于实践的研究:为期两周至48个月的随访。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Mar-Apr;27(3):160-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.12.020.
7
Chiropractic management of mechanical neck and low-back pain: a retrospective, outcome-based analysis.机械性颈痛和腰痛的整脊治疗:一项基于结果的回顾性分析。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Jun;23(5):307-11.
8
Dose-response for chiropractic care of chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛整脊治疗的剂量反应。
Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):574-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.02.008.
9
Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment.机械性下背痛:整脊疗法与医院门诊治疗的随机对照比较
BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1431-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1431.
10
Patient-centered professional practice models for managing low back pain in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial.以患者为中心的老年人下腰痛管理专业实践模式:一项随机对照试验试点研究
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 13;17(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0624-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Lack of pragmatic attitude of self-labelled pragmatic trials on manual therapy: a methodological review.自我标签的手法治疗实用性临床试验缺乏实用主义态度:方法学综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02393-1.
2
Immediate Effects of Spinal Manipulative Therapy on the Performance of Elite Brazilian Soccer Players: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial With an Internally Validated Sham Treatment.脊柱推拿疗法对巴西精英足球运动员表现的即时影响:一项采用内部验证性假治疗的先导随机对照试验
J Chiropr Med. 2022 Dec;21(4):270-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.021. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Spinal manipulative therapy in older adults with chronic low back pain: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
老年人慢性下腰痛的脊柱手法治疗:个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Jul;31(7):1821-1845. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07210-1. Epub 2022 May 28.
4
An Updated Overview of Low Back Pain Management.腰痛管理的最新概述。
Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):968-982. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0371. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
5
Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.脊柱手法治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 13;364:l689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l689.
6
Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手法治疗和关节松动术治疗慢性下腰痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2018 May;18(5):866-879. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist.使用CONSORT清单对整脊疗法随机对照试验报告的质量
Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Jun 9;24:19. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0099-6. eCollection 2016.
8
Changes in Quality of Life in 7 Older Adult Patients Receiving Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique.7例接受激活器法整脊技术的老年患者生活质量的变化。
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Mar;15(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
9
The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.期刊影响因子、报告冲突及报告资金来源对背痛试验标准化效应量的影响:一项系统评价与Meta回归分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 30;16:370. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0825-6.
10
A systematic review of the use of an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design.基于专业知识的随机对照试验设计应用的系统评价。
Trials. 2015 May 30;16:241. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0739-5.