Suppr超能文献

使用8电极单频生物电阻抗分析测量的全身脂肪百分比和节段性脂肪百分比的估计准确性:肥胖差异的影响。

Estimation accuracy of percent total body fat and percent segmental fat measured by single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with 8 electrodes: the effect of difference in adiposity.

作者信息

Demura S, Sato S, Kitabayashi T

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005 Mar;45(1):68-76.

Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of percent total body fat (%TBF) and percent segmental fat (%SF) measurements of new automatic single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with 8 electrodes (SF-BIA8), referenced to the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), between different fatness level female groups.

METHODS

Subjects were 34 overweight females (OWG) and 24 normal females (NG). This study used the BIA analyzer of Tanita BC-118 which is a commercially available single frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis system with 8 tactile electrodes.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability in each method was high (intra-class correlations > or =0.96). The SF-BIA8 tends to overestimate %TBF and %SF in the lower extremities and trunk compared with DXA, and consistency with DXA was especially low in %SFs in the lower extremities (left leg: r=0.475, SEE=4.673, right leg: r=0.494, SEE=4.772). Systematic errors regarding to the difference in fatness were found in %TBF and %SFs in lower extremities in OWG, and were found in %SF in upper extremities in NG. Furthermore, systematic errors regarding to the difference in body fat distribution were found in %SFs in lower extremities in OWG, and found in %SFs in upper extremities and trunk in NG.

CONCLUSIONS

SF-BIA can provide highly reproducible measurements of %TBF and %SF, but systematic errors based on the differences in fatness and body fat distribution were found. An improved prediction equation considering a variety in fat and body fat distribution will be needed in further investigations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较新型自动单频八电极生物电阻抗分析(SF-BIA8)测量的全身脂肪百分比(%TBF)和节段性脂肪百分比(%SF)与双能X线吸收法(DXA)相比,在不同肥胖水平女性群体中的准确性。

方法

研究对象为34名超重女性(OWG)和24名正常体重女性(NG)。本研究使用了Tanita BC-118型生物电阻抗分析仪,这是一种市售的带有8个触觉电极的单频生物电阻抗分析系统。

结果

每种方法的重测信度都很高(组内相关系数≥0.96)。与DXA相比,SF-BIA8往往会高估下肢和躯干的%TBF和%SF,尤其是下肢%SF与DXA的一致性较低(左腿:r = 0.475,标准误 = 4.673;右腿:r = 0.494,标准误 = 4.772)。在OWG中,下肢的%TBF和%SF存在与肥胖程度差异相关的系统误差,在NG中,上肢的%SF存在该系统误差。此外,OWG下肢的%SF存在与体脂分布差异相关的系统误差,NG上肢和躯干的%SF存在该系统误差。

结论

SF-BIA能够提供高度可重复的%TBF和%SF测量值,但发现了基于肥胖程度和体脂分布差异的系统误差。在进一步的研究中,需要一个考虑到脂肪和体脂分布多样性的改进预测方程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验