Sostman H D, Gottschalk A
Department of Radiology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Radiology. 1992 Aug;184(2):455-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.2.1620847.
The data base of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) was used to test the accuracy of the stripe sign for the exclusion of embolic perfusion defects on lung scintigrams. Lung scan readings showed the presence and location of this sign in 50 (4.7%) of 1,064 patients. Perfusion defects showing the stripe sign were not associated with pulmonary embolism in the same lung zone (upper, middle, or lower third of each lung) in 93% (79 of 85) of instances. Thirty-eight percent (n = 32) of lung zones with the stripe sign had associated chest radiographic abnormalities, and 69% (n = 59) had ventilation scan abnormalities. Formulation of the scan diagnosis according to PIOPED criteria showed fewer indeterminate readings in patients with the stripe sign and without pulmonary embolism when the stripe sign was used. Use of the sign changed diagnosis in less than 1% of the total population, however, because of its low overall prevalence. The stripe sign is a useful adjunct to standard criteria in the interpretation of pulmonary scintigrams for evaluation of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.
前瞻性肺栓塞诊断调查(PIOPED)数据库用于检验肺扫描图上条纹征排除栓塞性灌注缺损的准确性。在1064例患者中,有50例(4.7%)的肺扫描结果显示存在该征象及其位置。在93%(85例中的79例)的情况下,显示条纹征的灌注缺损与同一肺区(每个肺的上、中或下三分之一)的肺栓塞无关。有条纹征的肺区中,38%(n = 32)伴有胸部X线异常,69%(n = 59)伴有通气扫描异常。根据PIOPED标准进行扫描诊断时,对于有条纹征且无肺栓塞的患者,使用条纹征时不确定的读数较少。然而,由于其总体患病率较低,该征象在不到1%的总人口中改变了诊断结果。在解读用于评估疑似急性肺栓塞的肺闪烁图时,条纹征是对标准标准的有用辅助手段。