Grob D, Crisco J J, Panjabi M M, Wang P, Dvorak J
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Schulthess-Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 May;17(5):480-90. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199205000-00003.
Four different techniques for posterior atlantoaxial fusion were tested in vitro: 1) wire fixation with one median graft (Gallie type); 2) wire fixation with two bilateral grafts (Brooks type); 3) transarticular screw fixation (Magerl); and, 4) two bilateral posterior clamps (Halifax). The experiment was designed to determine the immediate three-dimensional stability of the spinal construct. Ten fresh human cadaveric specimens were tested intact, injured, and instrumented with each of the fixation techniques. The injury consisted of a severe soft tissue injury model, in which the alar, transverse, and capsular ligaments were transected. The three-dimensional motions of C1 relative to C2 were measured as the specimens were subjected to loads of pure moments in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. Each fixation technique significantly decreased motion in all directions, as compared to the intact and injured spines. We found that the Gallie system generally allowed significantly more rotation in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending than the other three fixation techniques. There was generally no significant difference between the amount of rotation with the other three fixation techniques. However, the Magerl technique tended to allow the least rotation. The anteroposterior translation of two points on C1 were about equal for all fixation techniques.
1)使用一块中间植骨的钢丝固定(加里氏法);2)使用两块双侧植骨的钢丝固定(布鲁克斯法);3)经关节螺钉固定(马格勒法);4)两个双侧后路夹(哈利法克斯夹)。该实验旨在确定脊柱结构的即时三维稳定性。对10个新鲜人体尸体标本进行了完整状态、损伤状态的测试,并使用每种固定技术进行了器械固定。损伤采用严重软组织损伤模型,其中切断了翼状韧带、横韧带和关节囊韧带。在标本承受屈伸、轴向旋转和侧方弯曲的纯力矩载荷时,测量C1相对于C2的三维运动。与完整和损伤的脊柱相比,每种固定技术均显著降低了各个方向的运动。我们发现,与其他三种固定技术相比,加里氏系统在屈伸、轴向旋转和侧方弯曲时通常允许显著更多的旋转。其他三种固定技术的旋转量之间通常没有显著差异。然而,马格勒技术往往允许的旋转最少。所有固定技术下C1上两点的前后平移大致相等。