Suppr超能文献

C1-C2 后路关节融合术技术的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis techniques.

作者信息

Papagelopoulos Panayiotis J, Currier Bradford L, Hokari Yukitaka, Neale Patricia G, Zhao Chunfeng, Berglund Lawrence J, Larson Dirk R, An Kai-Nan

机构信息

First Department of Orthopaedics, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):E363-70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060cc65.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical comparison of 5 atlantoaxial posterior arthrodesis techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative value of different posterior wire constructs when one or two transarticular screws are used.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A combination of Gallie or Brooks techniques and 2 posterior transarticular screws has been shown to be effective for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. Anatomic constraints may preclude the insertion of a transarticular screw unilaterally or bilaterally.

METHODS

Ten adult human cadaveric upper cervical spine specimens were used. The specimens were tested intact, after odontoidectomy and transverse and capsular ligament section and after stabilization with each of the 5 techniques: Brooks-Jenkins cable fixation, Brooks-Jenkins with unilateral transarticular screw, Gallie posterior wire construct with unilateral transarticular screw, Brooks-Jenkins with bilateral screws, and Gallie with bilateral screws. Pure moments were applied in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and torsion within physiologic limits (<1.5 Nm).

RESULTS

In flexion-extension and lateral bending, the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) increased significantly after the specimens were injured as compared with intact spines (P < 0.001). After stabilization, the ROM and NZ were significantly lower than in injured and intact spines in all motions (P < 0.01) except lateral bending in the intact spine. Among the 5 instrumented techniques, the ROM for the Gallie construct with 1 screw was significantly higher than for the Brooks-Jenkins construct with 1 or 2 screws in flexion-extension (P < 0.05). In axial torsion, the Gallie construct with 1 screw displayed a larger NZ and ROM than any of the other 4 constructs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Gallie or Brooks-Jenkins cable fixation alone may not be adequate for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. If 2 supplemented transarticular screws can beinserted, there is no difference between the Gallie or Brooks techniques. If only a single screw can be inserted, the Brooks-Jenkins technique is recommended rather than a Gallie technique.

摘要

研究设计

5种寰枢椎后路融合技术的生物力学比较

目的

评估在使用一枚或两枚经关节螺钉时不同后路钢丝结构的相对价值。

背景资料总结

已证明Gallie或Brooks技术与2枚后路经关节螺钉联合应用对寰枢椎融合有效。解剖学限制可能会妨碍单侧或双侧经关节螺钉的置入。

方法

使用10具成年人类尸体上颈椎标本。对标本进行完整测试、齿突切除及横韧带和关节囊韧带切断后测试,以及使用以下5种技术固定后测试:Brooks-Jenkins钢丝固定、带单侧经关节螺钉的Brooks-Jenkins技术、带单侧经关节螺钉的Gallie后路钢丝结构、带双侧螺钉的Brooks-Jenkins技术以及带双侧螺钉的Gallie技术。在生理极限范围内(<1.5 Nm)进行屈伸、侧屈和扭转时施加纯力矩。

结果

在屈伸和侧屈时,与完整脊柱相比,标本损伤后活动范围(ROM)和中性区(NZ)显著增加(P < 0.001)。固定后,除完整脊柱的侧屈外,所有运动中的ROM和NZ均显著低于损伤和完整脊柱(P < 0.01)。在5种固定技术中,在屈伸时,带1枚螺钉的Gallie结构的ROM显著高于带1枚或2枚螺钉的Brooks-Jenkins结构(P < 0.05)。在轴向扭转时,带1枚螺钉的Gallie结构显示出比其他4种结构更大的NZ和ROM(P < 0.05)。

结论

单独的Gallie或Brooks-Jenkins钢丝固定可能不足以实现寰枢椎融合。如果可以置入2枚辅助经关节螺钉,Gallie或Brooks技术之间没有差异。如果只能置入1枚螺钉,推荐使用Brooks-Jenkins技术而非Gallie技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验