• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Public opinion and policymaking in the states: the case of post-Roe abortion policy.

作者信息

Norrander B, Wilcox C

机构信息

University of Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Policy Stud J. 1999;27(4):707-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01998.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01998.x
PMID:16211767
Abstract

Whether public opinion should be expected to play a role in the shaping of abortion legislation in the states is a debatable question. Representation is a difficult task, especially if legislators receive mixed cues from the public, activists, and the political parties. In this study, we find that grass-roots activism and public opinion tend to match, and both are reflected in state abortion policy. In addition, more Pro-Life policies are found in states with a tradition of conservative policies in other areas, Republican majorities in the state legislature, more Catholic residents, and fewer women legislators. These patterns hold true for a composite index of abortion policies and for the specific policy area of government funding of abortions. Slightly different patterns occur for parental consent law, though these statutes also tend to reflect general preferences on abortion and interest group activity in a state.

摘要

相似文献

1
Public opinion and policymaking in the states: the case of post-Roe abortion policy.
Policy Stud J. 1999;27(4):707-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01998.x.
2
State political cultures and public opinion about abortion.
Polit Res Q. 1993 Dec;46(4):771-81. doi: 10.1177/106591299304600405.
3
Political effects of court decisions on abortion: a comparison between the United States and the German Federal Republic.
Int J Law Fam. 1989 Apr;3(1):106-36. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/3.1.106.
4
Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.堕胎保险范围在公共和私人保险计划中都存在争议。
State Reprod Health Monit. 1996 Sep;7(3):5-6.
5
Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994.堕胎政策回顾:合法性、医疗补助资金及父母参与情况,1967 - 1994年
Womens Rights Law Report. 1995 Winter;17(1):1-61.
6
Do women legislators matter? Female legislators and state abortion policy.
Am Polit Q. 1993 Jan;21(1):102-24. doi: 10.1177/1532673x9302100107.
7
"Crying stones": a comparison of abortion in Japan and the United States.
N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law. 1993;14(2-3):183-259.
8
The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Univ Mich J Law Reform. 1991 Winter;24(2):371-403.
9
Abortion: ambiguous criteria and confusing policies.堕胎:模糊的标准与混乱的政策。
Affilia. 1990 Winter;5(4):27-54. doi: 10.1177/088610999000500403.
10
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.州政府对堕胎的限制所产生的经济影响:父母同意和通知法以及医疗补助资金限制。
J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511.

引用本文的文献

1
Federalism and representation: Evidence from state abortion laws in the aftermath of Dobbs vs. Jackson women's health organization.联邦制与代表性:多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案后美国各州堕胎法的证据
PNAS Nexus. 2025 May 13;4(5):pgaf125. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf125. eCollection 2025 May.
2
"Distinct and Separate Issues": Examining US Adults' Attitudes Toward Abortion During COVID-19.“截然不同且相互独立的问题”:审视美国成年人在新冠疫情期间对堕胎的态度
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):8-16. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70002. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
Challenges to generating evidence-informed policy and the role of systematic reviews and (perceived) conflicts of interest.
生成基于证据的政策面临的挑战以及系统评价和(感知到的)利益冲突的作用。
J Commun Healthc. 2016;9(2):135-141. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2016.1182784. Epub 2016 May 20.
4
Secrets and Misperceptions: The Creation of Self-Fulfilling Illusions.秘密与误解:自我实现幻觉的形成
Sociol Sci. 2014 Nov;1:466-492. doi: 10.15195/v1.a26.
5
Cohort Abortion Measures for the United States.美国的队列流产措施。
Popul Dev Rev. 2013 Jun;39(2):289-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00592.x.
6
Improving state health policy assessment: an agenda for measurement and analysis.改善州立卫生政策评估:测量和分析的议程。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Sep;102(9):1697-705. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300716. Epub 2012 Jul 19.