Cowan Sarah K
New York University.
Sociol Sci. 2014 Nov;1:466-492. doi: 10.15195/v1.a26.
This study examines who hears what secrets, comparing two similar secrets-one that is highly stigmatized and one that is less so. Using a unique survey representative of American adults and intake forms from a medical clinic, I document marked differences in who hears these secrets. People who are sympathetic to the stigmatizing secret are more likely to hear of it than those who may react negatively. This is a consequence of people not just selectively disclosing their own secrets but selectively sharing others' as well. As a result, people in the same social network will be exposed to and influenced by different information about those they know and hence experience that network differently. When people effectively exist in networks tailored by others not to offend, then the information they hear tends to be that of which they already approve. Were they to hear secrets they disapproved of, then their attitudes might change, but they are less likely to hear those secrets. As such, the patterns of secret hearing contribute to a stasis in public opinion.
本研究考察了谁会听到哪些秘密,比较了两个类似的秘密——一个是高度污名化的,另一个则没那么严重。通过一项具有美国成年人代表性的独特调查以及一家医疗诊所的 intake 表格,我记录了听到这些秘密的人之间存在显著差异。同情污名化秘密的人比那些可能会有负面反应的人更有可能听说这个秘密。这不仅是人们有选择地披露自己秘密的结果,也是他们有选择地分享他人秘密的结果。因此,同一个社交网络中的人会接触到关于他们认识的人的不同信息,并受到这些信息的影响,从而以不同的方式体验那个网络。当人们实际上存在于由他人定制以免冒犯他人的网络中时,他们听到的信息往往是他们已经认可的信息。如果他们听到他们不认可的秘密,那么他们的态度可能会改变,但他们不太可能听到那些秘密。如此一来,秘密传播的模式导致了舆论的停滞不前。