Kuchulakanti Pramod K, Torguson Rebecca, Canos Daniel, Rha Seung-Woon, Chu William W, Clavijo Leonardo, Deible Regina, Gevorkian Natalie, Suddath William O, Satler Lowell F, Kent Kenneth M, Pichard Augusto D, Waksman Ron
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Oct 15;96(8):1100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.031. Epub 2005 Aug 29.
Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for repeat interventions and mortality after coronary angioplasty and stenting. The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) to improve the outcomes of these patients is a focus of interest. In the first 1,407 patients treated with SESs at our institution, 492 were diabetic (insulin dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM], n = 160 and non-insulin-dependent DM [NIDDM], n = 332). The in-hospital and 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes were compared with those of 915 patients without DM (non-DM). The baseline characteristics were similar, except for more women, obesity, previous myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, and renal insufficiency in the DM group (p <0.001). Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients had higher in-hospital (p <0.05) and 1-month mortality (p = 0.02). IDDM patients had more in-hospital renal failure (p = 0.04) and Q-wave myocardial infarctions (1.6% vs 0%, p = 0.04) compared with NIDDM patients, and higher mortality (3.1% vs 0.8%, p = 0.04) and subacute stent thromboses (2.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.07) than non-DM patients at 30 days. At 6 months, DM patients had a higher incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events, and composite of death and Q-wave myocardial infarction than non-DM patients (6.0% vs 2.7%, p = 0.01). Late outcomes between the IDDM and NIDDM groups were similar. Multivariate analysis showed diabetes and acute renal failure as independent predictors of target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion, our data showed that, despite a reduction in repeat revascularization, coronary intervention with SESs in diabetic patients is limited by higher mortality at 1 month and a higher incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events at 6 months compared with non-DM patients. Careful surveillance is required in IDDM patients undergoing SES implantation.
糖尿病患者在冠状动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后再次干预及死亡风险增加。西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)改善这些患者预后的疗效是人们关注的焦点。在我们机构接受SES治疗的首批1407例患者中,492例为糖尿病患者(胰岛素依赖型糖尿病[IDDM],n = 160;非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病[NIDDM],n = 332)。将其住院期间、1个月和6个月时的临床结局与915例非糖尿病(非DM)患者进行比较。除了DM组女性更多、肥胖、既往有心肌梗死、冠状动脉搭桥术和肾功能不全外,两组基线特征相似(p <0.001)。与非DM患者相比,DM患者住院期间死亡率更高(p <0.05)且1个月死亡率更高(p = 0.02)。与NIDDM患者相比,IDDM患者住院期间肾衰竭更多(p = 0.04)且Q波心肌梗死更多(1.6%对0%,p = 0.04),30天时死亡率更高(3.1%对0.8%,p = 0.04)且亚急性支架血栓形成更多(2.3%对0.5%,p = 0.07)。6个月时,DM患者Q波心肌梗死、靶病变血运重建-主要不良心脏事件以及死亡和Q波心肌梗死复合终点的发生率高于非DM患者(6.0%对2.7%,p = 0.01)。IDDM组和NIDDM组的远期结局相似。多变量分析显示糖尿病和急性肾衰竭是靶病变血运重建-主要不良心脏事件的独立预测因素。总之,我们的数据表明,尽管重复血运重建有所减少,但与非DM患者相比,糖尿病患者使用SES进行冠状动脉干预在1个月时死亡率更高,6个月时Q波心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建-主要不良心脏事件的发生率更高。对接受SES植入的IDDM患者需要进行仔细监测。