Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Mar 15;105(6):819-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.010.
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at a greater risk of mortality and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention than those without DM. We aimed to determine whether differences exist in the long-term mortality of patients with versus without DM who present with acute myocardial infarction and receive drug-eluting stents. Data were collected on 161 patients with and 395 without DM referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction and treated with drug-eluting stents. The patients with cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock were excluded. The 1-year major cardiac event (MACE) rates, defined as death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization, were compared between the 2 groups. The patients with DM were sicker at baseline. The MACE rates at 1 year were significantly increased in those with DM compared to those without DM. This was primarily driven by all-cause mortality. No differences in Q-wave myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, type of drug-eluting stents used, or procedure-related renal failure were seen. No differences were found in death or MACE rates at 1 year after adjusting for age, gender, race, systemic hypertension, peripheral artery disease, and a history of chronic renal failure between the 2 groups (weighted log-rank statistic, p = 0.37 and p = 0.37, respectively). In patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, those with DM were sicker than those without DM. In conclusion, after correction for co-morbid conditions, no difference was seen in the 1-year MACE or death rates between those with and without DM who presented with acute myocardial infarction and were treated with drug-eluting stents.
患有糖尿病(DM)的患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后死亡率和心血管事件发生率高于无 DM 患者。我们旨在确定患有和不患有糖尿病的急性心肌梗死患者在接受药物洗脱支架治疗后,长期死亡率是否存在差异。收集了 161 名患有和 395 名未患有糖尿病的急性心肌梗死患者的资料,这些患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,并接受了药物洗脱支架治疗。排除心脏骤停或心源性休克的患者。比较两组患者 1 年内主要心脏事件(MACE)的发生率,定义为死亡、Q 波心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建。两组患者在基线时的病情均较严重。与无 DM 组相比,DM 组患者 1 年时的 MACE 发生率显著升高。这主要是由全因死亡率引起的。两组患者在 Q 波心肌梗死、靶病变血运重建、支架血栓形成、药物洗脱支架使用类型或与手术相关的肾功能衰竭方面无差异。调整年龄、性别、种族、系统性高血压、外周动脉疾病和慢性肾功能衰竭病史后,两组患者在 1 年后的死亡或 MACE 发生率方面无差异(加权对数秩检验,p=0.37 和 p=0.37)。在患有急性心肌梗死的患者中,患有糖尿病的患者比不患有糖尿病的患者病情更严重。总之,在纠正合并症后,患有和不患有糖尿病的急性心肌梗死患者在接受药物洗脱支架治疗后,1 年 MACE 或死亡率无差异。