Suppr超能文献

静脉通路的来龙去脉:第一部分。

The ins and outs of venous access: part I.

作者信息

Vanek Vincent W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth Health Center, Youngstown, Ohio 44501-1790, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Clin Pract. 2002 Apr;17(2):85-98. doi: 10.1177/011542650201700285.

Abstract

Selection of the proper venous access device is important to maximize patient benefit and minimize patient discomfort, morbidity, mortality, and cost. The decision of which device to use is based on whether or not the patient requires central venous access and whether the need is short-term (<6 to 8 weeks) or long-term. Short-term venous access devices include short peripheral IV catheters, midline catheters, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC), and central venous catheters (CVC). This article reviews each of these short-term devices and their indications, contraindications, advantages, and disadvantages. Part 1 covers Venous Anatomy and Short-Term Venous Access; Part 2, to be published in the June issue, covers Long-Term Venous Access.

摘要

选择合适的静脉通路装置对于使患者受益最大化并将患者的不适、发病率、死亡率和成本降至最低非常重要。选用何种装置的决策取决于患者是否需要中心静脉通路以及这种需求是短期的(<6至8周)还是长期的。短期静脉通路装置包括短外周静脉留置针、中线导管、外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)和中心静脉导管(CVC)。本文回顾了这些短期装置及其适应证、禁忌证、优点和缺点。第1部分涵盖静脉解剖和短期静脉通路;第2部分将于6月刊发表,涵盖长期静脉通路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验