Suppr超能文献

疼痛部位和体格检查对确定肩袖撕裂部位有用吗?

Are pain location and physical examinations useful in locating a tear site of the rotator cuff?

作者信息

Itoi Eiji, Minagawa Hiroshi, Yamamoto Nobuyuki, Seki Nobutoshi, Abe Hidekazu

机构信息

Akita University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):256-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546505280430. Epub 2005 Oct 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain is the most common symptom of patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy, but little is known about the relationship between the site of pain and the site of cuff pathologic lesions. Also, accuracies of physical examinations used to locate a tear by assessing the muscle strength seem to be affected by the threshold for muscle weakness, but no studies have been reported regarding the efficacies of physical examinations in reference to their threshold.

HYPOTHESIS

Pain location is useful in locating a tear site. Efficacies of physical examinations to evaluate the function of the cuff muscles depend on the threshold for muscle weakness.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of 160 shoulders of 149 patients (mean age, 53 years) with either rotator cuff tears (140 shoulders) or cuff tendinitis (20 shoulders). The location of pain was recorded on a standardized form with 6 different areas. The diagnostic accuracies of the following tests were assessed with various thresholds for muscle weakness: supraspinatus test, the external rotation strength test, and the lift-off test.

RESULTS

Lateral and anterior portions of the shoulder were the most common sites of pain regardless of existence of tear or tear location. The supraspinatus test was most accurate when it was assessed to have positive results with the muscle strength less than manual muscle testing grade 5, whereas the lift-off test was most accurate with a threshold less than grade 3. The external rotation strength test was most accurate with a threshold of less than grade 4+.

CONCLUSION

The authors conclude that pain location is not useful in locating the site of a tear, whereas the physical examinations aiming to locate the tear site are clinically useful when assessed to have positive results with appropriate threshold for muscle weakness.

摘要

背景

疼痛是肩袖肌腱病患者最常见的症状,但对于疼痛部位与肩袖病理损伤部位之间的关系知之甚少。此外,通过评估肌肉力量来定位撕裂的体格检查准确性似乎受到肌肉无力阈值的影响,但尚无关于体格检查根据其阈值的有效性的研究报道。

假设

疼痛部位有助于定位撕裂部位。评估肩袖肌肉功能的体格检查有效性取决于肌肉无力的阈值。

研究设计

病例系列;证据等级,4级。

方法

作者回顾性分析了149例患者(平均年龄53岁)的160个肩部的临床病历,这些患者患有肩袖撕裂(140个肩部)或肩袖肌腱炎(20个肩部)。疼痛部位记录在一张标准化表格上,分为6个不同区域。对以下测试的诊断准确性进行了评估,采用了不同的肌肉无力阈值:冈上肌试验、外旋力量试验和抬离试验。

结果

无论是否存在撕裂或撕裂部位如何,肩部的外侧和前部是最常见的疼痛部位。当评估冈上肌试验肌肉力量小于徒手肌力测试5级时结果为阳性时,该试验最准确,而抬离试验阈值小于3级时最准确。外旋力量试验阈值小于4+级时最准确。

结论

作者得出结论,疼痛部位对定位撕裂部位无用,而旨在定位撕裂部位的体格检查在以适当的肌肉无力阈值评估为阳性结果时在临床上是有用的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验