• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评估表:规范数据。

The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data.

作者信息

Anderson Allen F, Irrgang James J, Kocher Mininder S, Mann Barton J, Harrast John J

机构信息

Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, 4230 Harding Road, 10th Floor, Nashville, TN 37205, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):128-35. doi: 10.1177/0363546505280214. Epub 2005 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1177/0363546505280214
PMID:16219941
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form may be used to measure symptoms, function, and sports activity for people with a variety of knee disorders, including ligamentous and meniscal injuries, osteoarthritis, and patellofemoral dysfunction. To date, normative data have not been established for this valid, reliable, and responsive outcomes instrument.

PURPOSE

To provide clinicians and researchers with normative data to facilitate the interpretation of results on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

The Subjective Knee Evaluation Form was mailed to 600 people in each of 8 age/gender categories (18-24 years, 25-34 years, 35-50 years, and 51-65 years for both male subjects and female subjects). Participants were drawn from a panel of 550 000 households (1 300 000 subjects) representative of noninstitutionalized persons in the United States and were matched to data from the United States Census Bureau on geographical region, market size, income, and household size.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 5246 knees. Twenty-eight percent of respondents reported an injury, weakness, or other problem with one or both knees. Normative data were determined for respondents as a whole and for the subset of respondents with no history of knee problems. Mean scores were determined for men aged 18 to 24 years (89 +/- 18), 25 to 34 years (89 +/- 16), 35 to 50 years (85 +/- 19), and 51 to 55 years (77 +/- 23); mean scores were also determined for women aged 18 to 24 years (86 +/- 19), 25 to 34 years (86 +/- 19), 35 to 50 years (80 +/- 23), and 51 to 65 years (71 +/- 26). Scores were higher for the subset of respondents with no history of current or prior knee problems.

CONCLUSION

Scores on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form vary by age, gender, and history of knee problems. The normative data collected in this article will allow clinicians to interpret how patients with knee injuries are functioning relative to their age- and gender-matched peers and will enable researchers to determine the clinical outcomes of treatment.

摘要

背景

国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评估表可用于测量患有各种膝关节疾病的人的症状、功能和体育活动情况,这些疾病包括韧带和半月板损伤、骨关节炎以及髌股关节功能障碍。迄今为止,尚未为这一有效、可靠且反应灵敏的结果评估工具建立规范数据。

目的

为临床医生和研究人员提供规范数据,以方便对国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评估表的结果进行解读。

研究设计

横断面调查。

方法

向8个年龄/性别类别(男性和女性各有18 - 24岁、25 - 34岁、35 - 50岁以及51 - 65岁)中的每一类600人邮寄主观膝关节评估表。参与者来自一个由55万户家庭(130万受试者)组成的小组,该小组代表美国非机构化人群,并与美国人口普查局关于地理区域、市场规模、收入和家庭规模的数据相匹配。

结果

获得了5246个膝关节的完整数据。28%的受访者报告一侧或双侧膝关节有损伤、无力或其他问题。确定了整体受访者以及无膝关节问题病史的受访者子集的规范数据。确定了18至24岁男性(89±18)、25至34岁男性(89±16)、35至50岁男性(85±19)以及51至55岁男性(77±23)的平均得分;同时也确定了18至24岁女性(86±19)、25至34岁女性(86±19)、35至50岁女性(80±23)以及51至65岁女性(71±26)的平均得分。无当前或既往膝关节问题病史的受访者子集得分更高。

结论

国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评估表的得分因年龄、性别和膝关节问题病史而异。本文收集的规范数据将使临床医生能够解读膝关节损伤患者相对于其年龄和性别匹配的同龄人功能状况如何,并使研究人员能够确定治疗的临床结果。

相似文献

1
The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data.国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评估表:规范数据。
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):128-35. doi: 10.1177/0363546505280214. Epub 2005 Oct 11.
2
The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Evaluation Form in a preadolescent population: pilot normative data.国际膝关节文献委员会青少年主观评估表:初步规范数据
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):129-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546507307394. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
3
IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients?国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分还是膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)?哪种指标对术后关节软骨修复患者的症状和残疾情况评估最为重要?
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Sep;36(9):1695-704. doi: 10.1177/0363546508317718. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
4
Assessment of differences between the modified Cincinnati and International Knee Documentation Committee patient outcome scores: a prospective study.改良辛辛那提和国际膝关节文献委员会患者结局评分之间差异的评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2151-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546509337698. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
5
The Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: Normative Data.儿科国际膝关节文献委员会(Pedi-IKDC)膝关节主观评估表:标准数据
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):527-534. doi: 10.1177/0363546516672456. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
6
Validity and reliability of Thai version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节量表泰语版的效度和信度
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Aug;91(8):1218-25.
7
Validity and internal consistency of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee evaluation form in children and adolescents.国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节主观评估表在儿童和青少年中的有效性和内部一致性。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Dec;38(12):2443-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546510374873. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
8
Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节量表的反应性
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1567-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546506288855. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
9
Validity and comprehensibility of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation form in Children.国际膝关节文献委员会儿童膝关节主观评估表的有效性和可理解性。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Feb;20(1):e87-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00917.x.
10
Lysholm score and Tegner activity level in individuals with normal knees.正常膝关节个体的Lysholm评分和Tegner活动水平。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 May;37(5):898-901. doi: 10.1177/0363546508330149. Epub 2009 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
MPFL reconstruction vs. Insall procedure for adolescent patellar instability: nine-year follow-up on osteoarthritis, redislocations, and return to sports.青少年髌骨不稳定的内侧髌股韧带重建术与英萨尔手术对比:关于骨关节炎、再脱位及恢复运动的九年随访
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 4;26(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08992-3.
2
Infrapatellar fat pad fibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with male sex, high body mass index, prolonged operation time and articular cartilage damage, with detrimental effects on one-year clinical outcomes.前交叉韧带重建术后髌下脂肪垫纤维化与男性、高体重指数、手术时间延长及关节软骨损伤相关,对一年临床结局有不利影响。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;12(3):e70365. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70365. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Current Concept Review: Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: From Rehabilitation to Return to Sport.当前概念综述:髌股内侧韧带重建:从康复到重返运动
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):1074-1090. doi: 10.26603/001c.141128. eCollection 2025.
4
Unraveling Osteoarthritis: Mechanistic Insights and Emerging Therapies Targeting Pain and Inflammation.解析骨关节炎:针对疼痛与炎症的机制见解及新兴疗法
Biomolecules. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):874. doi: 10.3390/biom15060874.
5
A Radiographic Investigation Exploring Differences in Static Anterior Tibial Translation Expressed as a Percentage Between ACL-Deficient and -Intact Patients to Improve Interobserver Variability Between Different Centers.一项影像学研究,旨在探索前交叉韧带损伤患者与前交叉韧带完整患者之间以百分比表示的静态胫骨前移差异,以改善不同中心之间的观察者间差异。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 2;13(6):23259671251330310. doi: 10.1177/23259671251330310. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Return to sport and patient reported outcomes in athletes participating in martial arts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at mean follow-up of 12 years.平均随访12年时,前交叉韧带重建术后参加武术运动的运动员恢复运动情况及患者报告的结局
J Exp Orthop. 2025 May 19;12(2):e70272. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70272. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
Tibial Eminence Avulsion Fracture in Pediatric Patients Reinserted with Arthroscopy and Pull-Out Suture Technique: Clinical and Functional Outcomes in a Long-Term Follow Up with Return to Sport.采用关节镜和拉出缝合技术重新固定的小儿胫骨髁间棘撕脱骨折:长期随访并恢复运动后的临床和功能结果
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;12(4):499. doi: 10.3390/children12040499.
8
Most Patients Report Acceptable Knee Function, Satisfaction, and Clinical Outcomes at a Minimum Ten Years After Quadriceps Free Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.大多数患者在股四头肌游离肌腱前交叉韧带重建术后至少十年报告了可接受的膝关节功能、满意度和临床结果。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Dec 11;7(2):101062. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101062. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Correlation and Comparative Evaluation of MOCART and MOCART 2.0 for Assessing Cartilage Repair.用于评估软骨修复的MOCART和MOCART 2.0的相关性及比较评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 18;61(4):745. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040745.
10
Clinical, Functional, Sports Participation, and Osteoarthritis Outcomes After ACL Injury: Ten-Year Follow-up Study of the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Treatment Algorithm.前交叉韧带损伤后的临床、功能、运动参与及骨关节炎结局:特拉华-奥斯陆前交叉韧带队列治疗算法的十年随访研究
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Apr 16;107(8):840-848. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00243. Epub 2025 Feb 7.