Welch J P, Hammond J G, Nissen C W
Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Connecticut.
Am Surg. 1992 May;58(5):300-4.
Giant gastric ulcers (greater than 3 cm in diameter) have traditionally been considered to be refractory to medical therapy and were commonly thought to initially appear as life-threatening hemorrhage requiring emergent operative therapy. This study was undertaken to evaluate the results of medical and surgical treatment of benign, giant gastric ulcers and the validity of these traditional teachings. A retrospective review of 44 patients with giant gastric ulcers was performed to evaluate the results of medical and surgical therapy at Hartford Hospital (Hartford, CT). The majority of these patients received medical therapy. Over 57 per cent received only medical therapy, while 25 per cent received primary, operative therapy. Contrary to popular belief, the authors found that patients who received initial medical therapy did not have high morbidity or mortality rates. Therefore, while the necessity of early surgical intervention following perforation or in patients with signs of hemorrhagic shock can not be refuted, the authors conclude that medical therapy of benign, giant gastric ulcers is often effective and not unduly hazardous. Giant gastric ulcers, in and of themselves, are not an indication for surgery.
传统上,巨大胃溃疡(直径大于3cm)被认为对药物治疗无效,通常认为其最初表现为危及生命的出血,需要紧急手术治疗。本研究旨在评估良性巨大胃溃疡的药物和手术治疗结果以及这些传统观点的正确性。对哈特福德医院(康涅狄格州哈特福德)44例巨大胃溃疡患者进行回顾性研究,以评估药物和手术治疗的结果。这些患者大多数接受了药物治疗。超过57%的患者仅接受了药物治疗,而25%的患者接受了初次手术治疗。与普遍看法相反,作者发现接受初始药物治疗的患者并没有高发病率或死亡率。因此,虽然穿孔后或有出血性休克迹象的患者早期手术干预的必要性无可争议,但作者得出结论,良性巨大胃溃疡的药物治疗通常是有效的,且并非过度危险。巨大胃溃疡本身并非手术指征。