Bol'shunov A V, Shmeleva-Demir O A, Ziangirova G G
Vestn Oftalmol. 2005 Jul-Aug;121(4):14-7.
To elucidate the extent to which contact and contactless procedures of diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) has a antihypertensive effect and a ocular tissue damaging effect, the authors have made a comparative assessment of the procedures to determine their preference. The study was conducted on an experimental material (5 Chinchilla rabbits (10 eyes)). The follow-up was 1 day to 6 months after laser interventions. The authors estimated the parameters of ocular hydrodynamics before and laser intervtntion throughout the follow-up and analyzed them with morphological changes kept in mind. The final antihypertensive effect of both contact and contactless procedures was virtually equal. However, less inflammatory changes and lower ocular damaging effect, and no additional medical manipulations for contactless diode laser CPC make it more preferable to contact CPC for clinical use.
为阐明二极管激光经巩膜睫状体光凝术（CPC）的接触式和非接触式操作在多大程度上具有降压作用和眼组织损伤作用，作者对这些操作进行了比较评估以确定其偏好。该研究以实验材料（5只灰鼠兔（10只眼））进行。随访时间为激光干预后1天至6个月。作者在整个随访过程中评估了激光干预前后的眼流体动力学参数，并在考虑形态学变化的情况下对其进行了分析。接触式和非接触式操作的最终降压效果几乎相同。然而，非接触式二极管激光CPC的炎症变化较少、眼损伤作用较低，且无需额外的医疗操作，这使得它在临床应用中比接触式CPC更可取。
