Jordan Timothy R, Patching Geoffrey R
School of Psychology, Henry Wellcome Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(5):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.08.008. Epub 2005 Oct 11.
A major concern when using lateralized words to study hemispheric asymmetry is that the retinal eccentricity of targets is matched across visual hemifields. The standard technique is to fixate a point fixed at the centre of the visual field. However, the demands of this fixation task are substantial and so may confound performance with lateralized targets. To investigate this possibility, words were presented unilaterally in each visual hemifield and retinal eccentricity was controlled using (a) a fixed central point or (b) a window technique that permitted small shifts in fixation while maintaining accurate retinal eccentricity by using automatic adjustments to target location. Fixation errors and time to fixate indicated that the demands of the standard technique were considerable and far greater than those of the window technique. Nevertheless, both techniques produced the same pattern of visual field effects, indicating that the demands of fixating a fixed central point do not confound performance with lateralized words. However, the window technique was more efficient and easier for participants to use and so offers a new improved methodology for studying hemispheric asymmetry.
使用偏向性词汇研究半球不对称性时,一个主要问题是目标在视网膜上的离心率需在两个视觉半视野中保持一致。标准技术是注视固定在视野中心的一个点。然而,这项注视任务要求颇高,因而可能会混淆对偏向性目标的表现。为探究这种可能性,在每个视觉半视野中单侧呈现词汇,并通过以下两种方式控制视网膜离心率:(a) 固定的中心点;(b) 窗口技术,即允许注视有小幅移动,同时通过自动调整目标位置来保持准确的视网膜离心率。注视误差和注视时间表明,标准技术的要求颇高,远高于窗口技术。尽管如此,两种技术产生的视野效应模式相同,这表明注视固定中心点的要求并不会混淆对偏向性词汇的表现。不过,窗口技术对参与者而言更高效、易用,因此为研究半球不对称性提供了一种新的改良方法。