相似文献
1
Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.
BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):897-900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7521.897.
2
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):417-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002.
3
The need for large-scale randomized evidence without undue emphasis on small trials, meta-analyses, or subgroup analyses.
JAMA. 2009 Dec 2;302(21):2361-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1756.
4
Subgroup analyses: when should we believe them?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94 Suppl 1:61-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00272.
5
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables.
BMJ. 2001 Jul 28;323(7306):224-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224.
6
Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.
Value Health. 2014 Mar;17(2):157-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.004.
7
Evidence based medicine.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2006 Jul-Sep;4(3):383-9.
8
[A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000 Sep 30;120(23):2810.
9
[Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Oct 16;162(42):5601.
10
Directed acyclic graphs can help understand bias in indirect and mixed treatment comparisons.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;65(7):798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Network meta-analysis of episiotomy approaches: comparing routine, restrictive, and non-episiotomy strategies and their effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes in primiparous patients.
Reprod Health. 2025 Sep 16;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02132-9.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for EGFRvIII positive recurrent glioblastoma.
iScience. 2025 Aug 13;28(9):113346. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113346. eCollection 2025 Sep 19.
3
CAD-CAM vs. conventional denture bases: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of studies comparing strength, hardness, toughness, and elastic properties.
Front Dent Med. 2025 Aug 11;6:1638794. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2025.1638794. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing serious adverse events after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Acta Orthop. 2025 Aug 19;96:640-649. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.44482.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of acupuncture for adolescent depression: protocol for a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 23;16:1624825. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1624825. eCollection 2025.
6
A leave-one-out algorithm for contribution analysis in component network meta-analysis.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02619-w.
7
Mind-body training outperforms other physical activities in reducing frailty and enhancing quality of life in older adults: a network meta-analysis.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 14;13:1578791. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578791. eCollection 2025.
8
Identifying optimal primary prevention interventions for major cardiovascular disease events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and hierarchical network meta-analysis of RCTs.
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(37):1-65. doi: 10.3310/RLDH7432.
9
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of nonpharmacological interventions for sleep disturbance among pregnant women: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 30;15(6):e096699. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096699.
10
Long-Term (5-Years) Outcomes of Current Drug-Eluting Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):1196-1211. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31668. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
本文引用的文献
1
Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9260.
2
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
3
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons.
Stat Med. 2004 Oct 30;23(20):3105-24. doi: 10.1002/sim.1875.
4
A rapid and systematic review and economic evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for treatment of mania associated with bipolar affective disorder.
Health Technol Assess. 2004 May;8(19):iii-iv, 1-187. doi: 10.3310/hta8190.
5
Clinical efficacy of antiretroviral combination therapy based on protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors: indirect comparison of controlled trials.
BMJ. 2004 Jan 31;328(7434):249. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37995.435787.A6. Epub 2004 Jan 23.
6
Early thrombolysis for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(15):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta7150.
7
Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis.
JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2534-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2534.
8
Primary angioplasty or thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction?
Lancet. 2003 Mar 15;361(9361):965-6; author reply 967-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12746-8.
9
Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
BMJ. 2003 Mar 1;326(7387):472. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.472.
10
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.
Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7.
Zotero 插件