Jovin Tudor G, Gupta Rishi, Uchino Ken, Jungreis Charles A, Wechsler Lawrence R, Hammer Maxim D, Tayal Ashis, Horowitz Michael B
Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Stroke Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Stroke. 2005 Nov;36(11):2426-30. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185924.22918.51. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
Acute ischemic stroke attributable to extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion is frequently associated with severe disability or death. In selected cases, revascularization with carotid artery stenting has been reported, but the safety, recanalization rate, and clinical outcomes in consecutive case series are not known.
We retrospectively reviewed all of the cases of ICA occlusions that underwent cerebral angiography with the intent to revascularize over a 38-month period. Two groups were identified: (1) patients who presented with an acute clinical presentation within 6 hours of symptom onset (n=15); and (2) patients who presented subacutely with neurologic fluctuations because of the ICA occlusion (n=10).
Twenty-five patients with a mean age of 62+/-11 years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 14 were identified. Twenty-three of the 25 patients (92%) were successfully revascularized with carotid artery stenting. Patients in group 1 were younger and more likely to have a tandem occlusion and higher baseline NIHSS when compared with group 2. Patients in group 2 were more likely to show early clinical improvement defined as a reduction of their NIHSS by > or =4 points and a modified Rankin Score of < or =2 at 30-day follow-up. Two clinically insignificant adverse events were noted: 1 asymptomatic hemorrhage and 1 nonflow-limiting dissection.
Endovascular treatment of acute ICA occlusion appears to have a high-recanalization rate and be relatively safe in our cohort of patients with acute ICA occlusion. Future prospective studies are necessary to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from this form of therapy.
颅外颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中常伴有严重残疾或死亡。在部分病例中,已有报道采用颈动脉支架置入术进行血管重建,但连续病例系列中的安全性、再通率及临床结局尚不清楚。
我们回顾性分析了在38个月期间接受脑血管造影以进行血管重建的所有ICA闭塞病例。确定了两组:(1)症状发作6小时内出现急性临床表现的患者(n = 15);(2)因ICA闭塞出现亚急性神经功能波动的患者(n = 10)。
共确定25例患者,平均年龄62±11岁,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)中位数为14。25例患者中有23例(92%)通过颈动脉支架置入术成功实现血管重建。与第2组相比,第1组患者更年轻,更可能存在串联闭塞,基线NIHSS更高。第2组患者更可能在30天随访时出现早期临床改善,定义为NIHSS降低≥4分且改良Rankin量表评分≤2分。记录到2例临床意义不大的不良事件:1例无症状出血和1例无血流限制的夹层。
在我们的急性ICA闭塞患者队列中,急性ICA闭塞的血管内治疗似乎具有较高的再通率且相对安全。未来有必要进行前瞻性研究以确定哪些患者最可能从这种治疗方式中获益。