Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.
Department of Neurology, Saint Vincent Mercy Hospital, Toledo, Ohio.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e230736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0736.
Approximately 10% to 20% of large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes involve tandem lesions (TLs), defined as concomitant intracranial LVO and stenosis or occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may benefit patients with TLs; however, optimal management and procedural strategy of the cervical lesion remain unclear.
To evaluate the association of carotid artery stenting (CAS) vs no stenting and medical management with functional and safety outcomes among patients with TL-LVOs.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with acute anterior circulation TLs admitted across 17 stroke centers in the US and Spain between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Data analysis was performed from August 2021 to February 2022. Inclusion criteria were age of 18 years or older, endovascular therapy for intracranial occlusion, and presence of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis (>50%) demonstrated on pre-MT computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography.
Patients with TLs were divided into CAS vs nonstenting groups.
Primary clinical and safety outcomes were 90-day functional independence measured by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), respectively. Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), discharge mRS score, ordinal mRS score, and mortality at 90 days.
Of 685 patients, 623 (mean [SD] age, 67 [12.2] years; 406 [65.2%] male) were included in the analysis, of whom 363 (58.4%) were in the CAS group and 260 (41.6%) were in the nonstenting group. The CAS group had a lower proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (38 [10.6%] vs 49 [19.2%], P = .002), a higher proportion of preprocedural degree of cervical stenosis on digital subtraction angiography (90%-99%: 107 [32.2%] vs 42 [20.5%], P < .001) and atherosclerotic disease (296 [82.0%] vs 194 [74.6%], P = .003), a lower median (IQR) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (15 [10-19] vs 17 [13-21], P < .001), and similar rates of intravenous thrombolysis and stroke time metrics when compared with the nonstenting group. After adjustment for confounders, the odds of favorable functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.20-2.40; P = .007), favorable shift in mRS scores (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.10; P = .04), and successful reperfusion (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-3.60; P = .002) were significantly higher for the CAS group compared with the nonstenting group. Both groups had similar odds of sICH (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.46-2.40; P = .87) and 90-day mortality (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.50-1.20; P = .27). No heterogeneity was noted for 90-day functional outcome and sICH in prespecified subgroups.
In this multicenter, international cross-sectional study, CAS of the cervical lesion during MT was associated with improvement in functional outcomes and reperfusion rates without an increased risk of sICH and mortality in patients with TLs.
大约 10% 到 20% 的大血管闭塞 (LVO) 卒中涉及串联病变 (TLs),定义为同时伴有颅内 LVO 和颈内动脉狭窄或闭塞。机械血栓切除术 (MT) 可能对 TLs 患者有益;然而,颈内病变的最佳治疗管理和手术策略仍不清楚。
评估在 TL-LVOs 患者中,颈动脉支架置入术 (CAS) 与不支架置入和药物治疗与功能和安全性结局的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在美国和西班牙的 17 家卒中中心连续收治的急性前循环 TLs 患者。数据分析于 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 2 月进行。纳入标准为年龄在 18 岁及以上,接受颅内闭塞的血管内治疗,且在 MT 前的计算机断层血管造影、磁共振血管造影或数字减影血管造影上显示存在颈内动脉狭窄 (>50%)。
TLs 患者分为 CAS 与非支架置入组。
主要临床和安全性结局是 90 天的改良 Rankin 量表 (mRS) 评分 0-2 分的功能独立性,以及症状性颅内出血 (sICH)。次要结局是改良脑梗死溶栓评分 (≥2b)、出院 mRS 评分、mRS 评分等级、90 天死亡率的成功再灌注。
在 685 例患者中,623 例(平均[SD]年龄 67[12.2]岁;406[65.2%]为男性)纳入分析,其中 363 例(58.4%)为 CAS 组,260 例(41.6%)为非支架置入组。CAS 组患者中房颤的比例较低(38[10.6%] vs 49[19.2%],P = .002),术前数字减影血管造影上颈内狭窄程度较高(90%-99%:107[32.2%] vs 42[20.5%],P < .001),动脉粥样硬化疾病的比例较高(296[82.0%] vs 194[74.6%],P = .003),中位数(IQR)国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分较低(15[10-19] vs 17[13-21],P < .001),与非支架置入组相比,静脉溶栓和卒中时间指标的发生率相似。在调整混杂因素后,CAS 组的功能结局良好(调整后的优势比[aOR],1.67;95%CI,1.20-2.40;P = .007)、mRS 评分改善(aOR,1.46;95%CI,1.02-2.10;P = .04)和成功再灌注(aOR,1.70;95%CI,1.02-3.60;P = .002)的几率明显高于非支架置入组。两组的 sICH 发生率(aOR,0.90;95%CI,0.46-2.40;P = .87)和 90 天死亡率(aOR,0.78;95%CI,0.50-1.20;P = .27)相似。在预设的亚组中,90 天功能结局和 sICH 没有异质性。
在这项多中心、国际横断面研究中,MT 期间颈内病变的 CAS 与 TLs 患者的功能结局改善和再灌注率提高相关,而不增加 sICH 和死亡率的风险。