Khan M H, Sinoway L I
Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033, USA.
Heart Fail Rev. 2000 Mar;5(1):87-100. doi: 10.1023/A:1009802308872.
Muscle reflex control of sympathetic nerve activity has been an area of considerable investigation. During exercise, the capacity of the peripheral vasculature to dilate far exceeds the maximal attainable levels of cardiac output. The activation of sympathetic nervous system and engagement of the myogenic reflex serve as the controlling influence between the heart and the muscle vasculature to maintain blood pressure (BP). Two basic theories of neural control have evolved. The first termed "central command", suggests that a volitional signal emanating from central motor areas leads to increased sympathetic activation during exercise. According to the second theory the stimulation of mechanical and chemical afferents in exercising muscle lead to engagement of the "exercise pressor reflex". Some earlier studies suggested that group III muscle afferent fibers are predominantly mechanically sensitive whereas unmyelinated group IV muscle afferents respond to chemical stimuli. In recent years new evidence is emerging which challenges the concept of functional differentiation of muscle afferents as well as the classic description of muscle "mechano" and "metabo" receptors. Studies measuring concentrations of interstitial substances during exercise suggest that K(+) and phosphate, but not H(+) and lactate, may be important muscle afferent stimulants. The role of adenosine as a muscle afferent stimulant remains an area of debate. There is strong evidence that sympathetic vasoconstriction due to muscle reflex engagement plays an important role in restricting blood flow to the exercising muscle. In heart failure (HF), exercise leads to premature fatigue and accumulation of muscle metabolites resulting in a greater degree of muscle reflex engagement and in the process further decreasing the muscle blood flow. Conditioning leads to an increased ability of the muscle to maintain aerobic metabolism, lower interstitial accumulation of metabolites, less muscle reflex engagement and a smaller sympathetic response. Beneficial effects of physical conditioning may be mediated by a direct reduction of muscle metaboreflex activity or via reduction of metabolic signals activating these receptors. In this review, we will discuss concepts of flow and reflex engagement in normal human subjects and then contrast these findings with those seen in heart failure (HF). We will then examine the effects of exercise conditioning on these parameters in normal subjects and those with congestive heart failure (CHF).
肌肉反射对交感神经活动的控制一直是一个备受关注的研究领域。在运动过程中,外周血管舒张的能力远远超过心输出量的最大可达到水平。交感神经系统的激活和肌源性反射的参与,是心脏与肌肉血管系统之间维持血压(BP)的控制因素。神经控制的两种基本理论逐渐形成。第一种称为“中枢指令”,认为来自中枢运动区域的意志信号会导致运动期间交感神经激活增加。根据第二种理论,运动肌肉中的机械和化学传入神经的刺激会导致“运动升压反射”的参与。一些早期研究表明,Ⅲ类肌肉传入纤维主要对机械刺激敏感,而无髓鞘的Ⅳ类肌肉传入纤维对化学刺激有反应。近年来,新的证据不断涌现,对肌肉传入神经功能分化的概念以及肌肉“机械”和“代谢”受体的经典描述提出了挑战。运动期间测量间质物质浓度的研究表明,钾离子(K⁺)和磷酸盐,而非氢离子(H⁺)和乳酸,可能是重要的肌肉传入神经刺激物。腺苷作为肌肉传入神经刺激物的作用仍是一个有争议的领域。有强有力的证据表明,由于肌肉反射参与导致的交感神经血管收缩在限制运动肌肉的血流方面起着重要作用。在心力衰竭(HF)中,运动导致过早疲劳和肌肉代谢产物积累,从而导致更大程度的肌肉反射参与,在此过程中进一步减少肌肉血流。运动训练导致肌肉维持有氧代谢的能力增强、间质代谢产物积累减少、肌肉反射参与减少以及交感神经反应减弱。身体运动训练的有益效果可能是通过直接降低肌肉代谢反射活动或通过减少激活这些受体的代谢信号来介导的。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论正常人类受试者中血流和反射参与的概念,然后将这些发现与心力衰竭(HF)患者的发现进行对比。然后,我们将研究运动训练对正常受试者和充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者这些参数的影响。