Poulton B, Ridley S, Mackenzie-Ross R, Rizvi S
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2005 Nov;60(11):1101-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04333.x.
Considerable variation in end-of-life decision making is reported between intensive care units in the United Kingdom, possibly because of differences in casemix. Senior medical staff within any one unit should, however, be consistent in such decision making. We reviewed the medical records for a 4-year period to establish if there was consistency in our own unit. This revealed considerable variation in the apparent willingness of consultants to make end-of-life decisions, emphasising the subjective nature of these decisions. Personality typing (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) of consultants revealed that those who had made more than the expected number of decisions had scores towards the judging end of the judging/perceiving domain.
据报道,英国各重症监护病房在临终决策方面存在很大差异,这可能是由于病例组合的差异所致。然而,任何一个病房的高级医务人员在这类决策中应该保持一致。我们查阅了四年期间的病历,以确定我们自己的病房是否存在一致性。这显示出顾问医生在做出临终决策的明显意愿上存在很大差异,强调了这些决策的主观性。对顾问医生进行的性格类型测试(迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类法)显示,做出超过预期数量决策的医生在判断/感知维度中偏向判断一端。