Kawabe Hiroshi, Saito Ikuo, Saruta Takao
Health Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2005 Jun;28(6):491-8. doi: 10.1291/hypres.28.491.
To assess home blood pressure status in a Japanese urban population, we analyzed home blood pressure values in normotensive subjects determined by casual blood pressure (< 140/90 mmHg), hypertensive subjects without medication (> or = 140/90 mmHg) and treated hypertensive patients. The subjects (468 male, 232 female; mean age 41 years old) were recruited from a company located in Tokyo. Home blood pressure was measured with a semi-automatic device (Omron HEM-759P). Subjects were instructed to perform triplicate morning and evening measurements on 7 consecutive days. In the treated hypertensive group (n = 70), there was a significant difference between morning (139 +/- 12/88 +/- 9 mmHg) and evening (130 +/- 12/79 +/- 8 mmHg) home blood pressure. In the normotensive group (n = 558), however, only the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) component of the home blood pressure was significantly different between morning (115 +/- 13/72 +/- 9 mmHg) and evening (114 +/- 12/68 +/- 8 mmHg). In the nontreated hypertensive group (n = 72), casual blood pressure (145 +/- 14/92 +/- 9 mmHg) was higher than morning (138 +/- 16/89 +/- 11 mmHg) and evening (134 +/- 16/83 +/- 11 mmHg) home blood pressure, but no difference was seen between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (SBP). According to the reference value of the Japanese Society of Hypertension 2004 (SBP > or = 135 mmHg and/or DBP > or = 85 mmHg), 7.2% (systolic) and 8.7% (diastolic) of subjects in the normotensive group were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Casual blood pressure in the treated hypertensive group was normal in 64.3% for SBP and 70.0% for DBP. However, their morning SBP (32.9%), morning DBP (40.0%), evening SBP (10.0%), and evening DBP (17.1%) were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Furthermore, patients who were taking antihypertensive drug(s) only in the morning (n = 52) showed higher morning SBP (6 mmHg, p = 0.086) and morning DBP (6 mmHg, p = 0.005) than patients taking drug(s) by other administration schedules (n = 18), but no difference in evening home blood pressure was observed. In conclusion, a proportion of the subjects defined as normotensive by casual blood pressure were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure in the present urban population. Furthermore, morning home blood pressure control in the treated hypertensive group classified as under control by casual blood pressure was insufficient, especially in patients who were taking medication only in the morning.
为评估日本城市人群的家庭血压状况,我们分析了通过偶测血压(<140/90 mmHg)确定的血压正常受试者、未服药的高血压受试者(≥140/90 mmHg)以及接受治疗的高血压患者的家庭血压值。受试者(468名男性,232名女性;平均年龄41岁)来自位于东京的一家公司。使用半自动设备(欧姆龙HEM - 759P)测量家庭血压。受试者被要求连续7天每天早晚各测量三次。在接受治疗的高血压组(n = 70)中,早晨(139±12/88±9 mmHg)和晚上(130±12/79±8 mmHg)的家庭血压存在显著差异。然而,在血压正常组(n = 558)中,仅家庭血压的舒张压(DBP)部分在早晨(115±13/72±9 mmHg)和晚上(114±12/68±8 mmHg)之间存在显著差异。在未治疗的高血压组(n = 72)中,偶测血压(145±14/92±9 mmHg)高于早晨(138±16/89±11 mmHg)和晚上(134±16/83±11 mmHg)的家庭血压,但早晨和晚上的收缩压(SBP)之间没有差异。根据日本高血压学会2004年的参考值(SBP≥135 mmHg和/或DBP≥85 mmHg),血压正常组中7.2%(收缩压)和8.7%(舒张压)的受试者通过家庭血压被归类为高血压。接受治疗的高血压组中,偶测血压的收缩压正常率为64.3%,舒张压正常率为70.0%。然而,他们早晨的收缩压(32.9%)、早晨的舒张压(40.0%)、晚上的收缩压(10.0%)和晚上的舒张压(17.1%)通过家庭血压被归类为高血压。此外,仅在早晨服用降压药的患者(n = 52)比按其他给药方案服药的患者(n = 18)早晨收缩压更高(6 mmHg,p = 0.086),早晨舒张压更高(6 mmHg,p = 0.005),但晚上家庭血压未观察到差异。总之,在当前城市人群中,一部分通过偶测血压定义为血压正常的受试者通过家庭血压被归类为高血压。此外,在通过偶测血压被归类为血压控制良好的接受治疗的高血压组中,早晨家庭血压控制不足,尤其是仅在早晨服药的患者。