Sumi Madoka, Ushigome Emi, Kitagawa Nobuko, Kitagawa Noriyuki, Tanaka Toru, Hasegawa Goji, Ohnishi Masayoshi, Tsunoda Sei, Nakanishi Naoko, Okada Hiroshi, Hamaguchi Masahide, Fukui Michiaki
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Diabetology, Kameoka Municipal Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2025 Mar;48(3):950-958. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-02049-z. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
Home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring is a better prognostic predictor than clinical BP monitoring. However, the suggested number of HBP measurements in each occasion varies across guidelines. The study aimed to identify which HBP measurements in each occasion are more closely associated with new cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. This retrospective cohort study included 1082 patients with type 2 diabetes without a history of macrovascular complications. HBP was measured three times each morning and evening for 14 days, and the average value over the 14 days was calculated. During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, 117 patients (11.1%) had cardiovascular events. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the association between the average morning home systolic BP (MHSBP) for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd measurements and cardiovascular events. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence interval) for the onset of cardiovascular events in the 2nd and 3rd mean MHSBP were 1.129 (1.008-1.265) and 1.135 (1.010-1.275), respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the 2nd, 1st/2nd, 2nd/3rd, and 1st/2nd/3rd mean MHSBP was significantly greater than that of the 1st mean MHSBP (p = 0.040, p = 0.014, p = 0.020, and p = 0.021, respectively). No significant difference was observed between the AUC of the 2nd/3rd and 1st/2nd/3rd mean MHSBP and that of the 1st/2nd mean MHSBP. We recommend that HBP measurements be taken just twice per occasion to predict cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.
家庭血压(HBP)监测比临床血压监测是更好的预后预测指标。然而,每次建议的HBP测量次数在不同指南中有所不同。该研究旨在确定每次测量中哪些HBP测量值与2型糖尿病患者新的心血管事件更密切相关。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了1082例无大血管并发症病史的2型糖尿病患者。在14天内,每天早晚各测量HBP三次,并计算14天的平均值。在中位随访7.0年期间,117例患者(11.1%)发生了心血管事件。采用Cox比例风险模型来检验第1次、第2次和第3次测量的平均早晨家庭收缩压(MHSBP)与心血管事件之间的关联。第2次和第3次平均MHSBP时心血管事件发生的调整后风险比(HR)(95%置信区间)分别为1.129(1.008 - 1.265)和1.135(1.010 - 1.275)。第2次、第1次/第2次、第2次/第3次和第1次/第2次/第3次平均MHSBP的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)显著大于第1次平均MHSBP的AUC(分别为p = 0.040、p = 0.014、p = 0.020和p = 0.021)。第2次/第3次平均MHSBP与第1次/第2次/第3次平均MHSBP的AUC和第1次/第2次平均MHSBP的AUC之间未观察到显著差异。我们建议,为预测2型糖尿病患者的心血管事件,每次仅需测量两次HBP。