Mullooly John P, Valanis Barbara, Maher Julie E, Vuckovic Nancy A, Slepack Jerry, Cooksey Susan G, Easter Kathy, Stevens Nancy H, Irwin Kathleen, Dixon Janelle, Anderson Lynda A
Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Oct;11(10):609-18.
To improve services for sex partners of chlamydia-infected patients (ie, chlamydia partner services [CPS]) at an HMO.
Assessment of current CPS policy, practices, and opinions in Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region (KPNW) and in local health departments, and design, implementation, and evaluation of 4 CPS interventions.
We reviewed KPNW policy documents, conducted focus groups with KPNW clinicians, and did phone interviews with KPNW chlamydia-infected patients and health department disease intervention specialists. We then implemented 3 informational interventions: CPS information was added to the after-visit summary given to patients tested for chlamydia; information on how to test, treat, and counsel chlamydia-infected patients was added to KPNW's electronic clinical-decision tool; and CPS information and a direct link to KPNW's chlamydia screening and treatment guidelines were added to KPNW's Web site. We also organized training for KPNW clinicians to review the roles of CPS and disease intervention specialists. We evaluated intervention uptake and impact by reviewing electronic medical charts, Web site "hits," and posttraining evaluations.
Clinicians and disease intervention specialists reported that KPNW's CPS policy and the roles of disease intervention specialists regarding KPNW patients were unclear. Clinicians and patients wanted more CPS information. Clinicians commonly used the after-visit summary and Web-based CPS information and reported that training improved CPS knowledge. However, none used the clinical-decision tool.
Several simple, centralized informational interventions to improve CPS were feasible and used by KPNW clinicians. These interventions could potentially be used in other settings structured like KPNW.
改善健康维护组织(HMO)中衣原体感染患者性伴侣的服务(即衣原体伴侣服务 [CPS])。
评估凯撒医疗集团西北区域(KPNW)和当地卫生部门当前的 CPS 政策、实践和意见,并设计、实施和评估 4 项 CPS 干预措施。
我们查阅了 KPNW 的政策文件,与 KPNW 的临床医生进行了焦点小组讨论,并对 KPNW 的衣原体感染患者和卫生部门疾病干预专家进行了电话访谈。然后我们实施了 3 项信息干预措施:将 CPS 信息添加到衣原体检测患者的就诊后总结中;在 KPNW 的电子临床决策工具中添加有关如何检测、治疗和咨询衣原体感染患者的信息;在 KPNW 的网站上添加 CPS 信息以及指向 KPNW 衣原体筛查和治疗指南的直接链接。我们还为 KPNW 的临床医生组织了培训,以回顾 CPS 和疾病干预专家的职责。我们通过查阅电子病历、网站“点击量”和培训后评估来评估干预措施的采用情况和影响。
临床医生和疾病干预专家报告称,KPNW 的 CPS 政策以及疾病干预专家对 KPNW 患者的职责不明确。临床医生和患者希望获得更多 CPS 信息。临床医生普遍使用就诊后总结和基于网络的 CPS 信息,并报告称培训提高了对 CPS 的认识。然而,没有人使用临床决策工具。
几项简单、集中的信息干预措施对于改善 CPS 是可行的,并且 KPNW 的临床医生采用了这些措施。这些干预措施可能适用于其他类似 KPNW 结构的环境。