Suppr超能文献

美国浸润性宫颈癌预处理评估中诊断性检查的应用:ACRIN 6651/GOG 183组间方案的结果

Utilization of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: results of intergroup protocol ACRIN 6651/GOG 183.

作者信息

Amendola Marco A, Hricak Hedvig, Mitchell Donald G, Snyder Bradley, Chi Dennis S, Long Harry J, Fiorica James V, Gatsonis Constantine

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7454-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.5397.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To review the current utilization of diagnostic tests prescribed by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical staging guidelines in the pretreatment work-up of invasive cervical cancer, and to compare the data with those of previous patterns of care studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This interdisciplinary American College of Radiology Imaging Network/Gynecologic Oncology Group prospective clinical trial was conducted between March 1, 2000, and November 11, 2002. Twenty-five participating institutions, all from the United States, enrolled a total of 208 patients. Only patients scheduled for surgery with biopsy-confirmed cervical cancer of clinical FIGO stage IB or higher were eligible. The patterns of care data analysis was based on 197 patients who met all inclusion criteria. The conventional FIGO-recommended tests used for pre-enrollment FIGO clinical stage classification were at the discretion of the treating physician; overall frequency of use was tabulated for each test.

RESULTS

Use of cystoscopy (8.1%) and sigmoidoscopy or proctoscopy (8.6%) was significantly lower than in 1988 to 1989 (P < .0001 in each instance). Intravenous urography was used in only 1% of patients as compared with 42% in 1988 to 1989 and 91% in 1983. No patient included in the data analysis had barium enema or lymphangiography. Only 26.9% of patients had examination under anesthesia for FIGO clinical staging.

CONCLUSION

There is a large discrepancy between the diagnostic tests recommended by FIGO and the actual tests used for cervical cancer staging, suggesting a need to reassess the relevance of the FIGO guidelines to current clinical practice in the United States.

摘要

目的

回顾国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)临床分期指南所规定的诊断检查在浸润性宫颈癌术前检查中的当前应用情况,并将数据与以往的治疗模式研究数据进行比较。

患者与方法

这项跨学科的美国放射学会影像网络/妇科肿瘤学组前瞻性临床试验于2000年3月1日至2002年11月11日进行。25个参与机构均来自美国,共招募了208例患者。仅计划接受手术且活检确诊为FIGO临床分期IB期或更高期别的宫颈癌患者符合条件。治疗模式数据分析基于197例符合所有纳入标准的患者。用于入组前FIGO临床分期分类的传统FIGO推荐检查由治疗医师自行决定;统计每种检查的总体使用频率。

结果

膀胱镜检查(8.1%)和乙状结肠镜检查或直肠镜检查(8.6%)的使用显著低于1988年至1989年(每次P <.0001)。静脉肾盂造影仅在1%的患者中使用,而1988年至1989年为42%,1983年为91%。数据分析中的患者均未进行钡灌肠或淋巴管造影。仅26.9%的患者因FIGO临床分期接受了麻醉下检查。

结论

FIGO推荐的诊断检查与用于宫颈癌分期的实际检查之间存在很大差异,这表明有必要重新评估FIGO指南与美国当前临床实践的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验