• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈癌 IIIC-r 期 5 年总生存率与 I 期和 II 期无明显差异:单中心回顾性分析。

The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.

Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 27;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07890-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-07890-w
PMID:33639874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7912513/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging guideline for cervical cancer includes stage IIIC recognized by preoperative radiology (IIIC-r) to state there are lymph nodes metastases (LNM) identified by imaging tools. We aim to explore the reasonability and limitations of stage IIIC-r and try to explore the potential reasons.

METHODS

Electronic medical records were used to identify patients with cervical cancer. According to the new staging guidelines, patients were reclassified and assigned into five cohorts: stage I, stage II, stage IIIC-r, LNM confirmed by pathology (IIIC-p) and LNM detected by radiology and confirmed by pathology (IIIC r + p). Five-year overall survivals were estimated for each cohort. The diagnosis accuracy of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diameter of detected lymph nodes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 619 patients were identified. The mean follow-up months were 65 months (95% CI 64.43-65.77) for all patients. By comparison, the 5-year overall survival rates were not statistically different (p = 0.21) among stage IIIC-r, stage I and stage II. While, the rates were both statistical different (p<0.001) among stage IIIC-p, IIIC r + p and stage I and stage II. The sensitivities of CT and MRI in detecting LNM preoperatively were 51.2 and 48.8%. The mean maximum diameter of pelvic lymph nodes detected by CT cohort was 1.2 cm in IIIC-r cohort, and was 1.3 cm in IIIC r + p cohort. While, the mean maximum diameter of pelvic lymph nodes detected by MRI was 1.2 cm in IIIC-r cohort, and was 1.48 cm in IIIC r + p cohort. When the diagnosis efficacy of the diameter of pelvic lymph nodes in detecting LNM were evaluated, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was 0.58 (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that the FIGO 2018 staging guideline for cervical cancer is likely to has certain limitations for the classification of those with LNM. CT or MRI, however, has limitations on detecting LNM. It would be better to use more accurate imaging tools to identify LNM in the clinical practices.

摘要

背景

2018 年国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)宫颈癌分期指南包括术前影像学检查(IIIC-r)确认的 IIIC 期,以表明存在影像学工具识别的淋巴结转移(LNM)。我们旨在探讨 IIIC-r 的合理性和局限性,并尝试探讨潜在原因。

方法

使用电子病历识别宫颈癌患者。根据新的分期指南,将患者重新分类并分为五组:I 期、II 期、IIIC-r 期、经病理证实的 LNM(IIIC-p)和经影像学和病理证实的 LNM(IIIC r+p)。为每个队列估计了 5 年总生存率。还评估了计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和检测到的淋巴结直径的诊断准确性。

结果

共确定了 619 名患者。所有患者的中位随访时间为 65 个月(95%CI 64.43-65.77)。相比之下,IIIC-r、I 期和 II 期的 5 年总生存率无统计学差异(p=0.21)。然而,IIIC-p、IIIC r+p 和 I 期和 II 期之间的生存率均有统计学差异(p<0.001)。CT 和 MRI 术前检测 LNM 的灵敏度分别为 51.2%和 48.8%。在 IIIC-r 队列中,CT 检测到的盆腔淋巴结的平均最大直径为 1.2cm,在 IIIC r+p 队列中为 1.3cm。而在 IIIC-r 队列中,MRI 检测到的盆腔淋巴结的平均最大直径为 1.2cm,在 IIIC r+p 队列中为 1.48cm。当评估盆腔淋巴结直径对检测 LNM 的诊断效果时,受试者工作特征曲线(ROC 曲线)下面积为 0.58(p=0.05)。

结论

FIGO 2018 年宫颈癌分期指南似乎对 LNM 患者的分类存在一定局限性。然而,CT 或 MRI 在检测 LNM 方面存在局限性。在临床实践中,最好使用更准确的成像工具来识别 LNM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc5/7912513/3801da9cebad/12885_2021_7890_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc5/7912513/d988254cc1e4/12885_2021_7890_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc5/7912513/7fdcc19870d1/12885_2021_7890_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc5/7912513/3801da9cebad/12885_2021_7890_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc5/7912513/d988254cc1e4/12885_2021_7890_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc5/7912513/7fdcc19870d1/12885_2021_7890_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc5/7912513/3801da9cebad/12885_2021_7890_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.宫颈癌 IIIC-r 期 5 年总生存率与 I 期和 II 期无明显差异:单中心回顾性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 27;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07890-w.
2
Rationality of FIGO 2018 IIIC cervical cancer according to local tumor and pelvic lymph node metastatic extent-a cohort study.根据局部肿瘤和盆腔淋巴结转移范围探讨2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IIIC期宫颈癌的合理性——一项队列研究
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03846-5.
3
Re-evaluating prognostic factors for cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis: a Japanese multicenter cohort study based on FIGO 2018.重新评估伴有淋巴结转移的宫颈癌的预后因素:一项基于国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2018年标准的日本多中心队列研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar;30(3):584-592. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02697-2. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
4
Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和磁共振成像(MRI)在早期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移评估中的应用:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(4):iii-iv, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta15040.
5
Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.术前磁共振成像中肿瘤直径对 FIGO 分期 IB1 期宫颈癌的宫旁浸润的诊断影响。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Feb;21(2):349-54.
6
Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound examination in preoperative pelvic staging of early-stage cervical cancer: post-hoc analysis of SENTIX study.磁共振成像和超声检查在早期宫颈癌术前盆腔分期中的应用:SENTIX研究的事后分析
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;65(4):495-502. doi: 10.1002/uog.29205. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
7
Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.局部晚期宫颈癌的术前手术主动脉旁淋巴结评估
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13(4):CD008217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008217.pub2.
8
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
9
Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status.治疗前淋巴结转移作为宫颈癌的预后意义:疾病状态之间的比较。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;52(2):516-523. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.328. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
10
CT Scans Understage Lymph Nodes in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.CT扫描显示胃及胃食管腺癌的隐匿性淋巴结
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;131(8):1571-1579. doi: 10.1002/jso.28112. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of oncological outcomes and complication rate between radical hysterectomy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IIICr cervical cancer without parametrial invasion.IIICr期无宫旁浸润宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术与同步放化疗的肿瘤学结局及并发症发生率比较
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14196-8.
2
Construction and evaluation of a prognostic model for cervical cancer based on dynamic hematological and clinical features.基于动态血液学和临床特征的宫颈癌预后模型的构建与评估
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13595-1.
3
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Stage III C Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.早期宫颈癌前哨淋巴结活检:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Apr;10(8):2590-2600. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3645. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
2
Recent Increasing Incidence of Early-Stage Cervical Cancers of the Squamous Cell Carcinoma Subtype among Young Women.近年来年轻女性中早期宫颈鳞状细胞癌亚型的发病率不断上升。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20):7401. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207401.
3
Development of a Deep Learning Model to Identify Lymph Node Metastasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
根治性放疗或放化疗治疗 IIIB 期宫颈癌患者的临床结局和预后因素。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241254075. doi: 10.1177/15330338241254075.
4
Average log change rate of pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IIIC1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.同期放化疗后 IIIC1 期宫颈鳞癌患者治疗前鳞状细胞癌抗原的平均对数变化率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8710. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59412-w.
5
Integrated pretreatment diffusion kurtosis imaging and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels: a biomarker strategy for early assessment of radiotherapy outcomes in cervical cancer.联合预处理扩散峰度成像和血清鳞状细胞癌抗原水平:一种用于早期评估宫颈癌放疗效果的生物标志物策略。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 May;49(5):1502-1511. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04270-3. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
基于深度学习的宫颈癌患者磁共振成像淋巴结转移的预测模型研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011625. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11625.
4
Corrigendum to "Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri" [Int J Gynecol Obstet 145(2019) 129-135].《子宫颈癌的FIGO分期修订版》勘误[《国际妇产科杂志》145(2019) 129 - 135]
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Nov;147(2):279-280. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12969.
5
Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.2018 年国际妇产科联合会宫颈癌分期指南的预后性能。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;134(1):49-57. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003311.
6
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.FIGO 修订版子宫颈癌分期。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):129-135. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12749. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system.FIGO 2018 宫颈癌分期系统的验证。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jan;152(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
8
FIGO Cancer Report 2018.《国际妇产科联盟2018年癌症报告》
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143 Suppl 2:2-3. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12608.
9
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.CT、MRI、正电子发射断层扫描或正电子发射断层扫描/CT以及扩散加权成像-MRI检测宫颈癌患者淋巴结转移的综合比较:基于67项研究的荟萃分析
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(3):209-222. doi: 10.1159/000456006. Epub 2017 Feb 10.