Davey P, Brown E, Fenelon L, Finch R, Gould I, Hartman G, Holmes A, Ramsay C, Taylor E, Wilcox M, Wiffen P
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, MEMO, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Dundee, Scotland, UK DD1 9SY.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub2.
Up to 50% of antibiotic usage in hospitals is inappropriate. In hospitals infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria are associated with higher mortality, morbidity and prolonged hospital stay compared with infections caused by antibiotic-susceptible bacteria. Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD) is a hospital acquired infection that is caused by antibiotic prescribing.
To estimate the effectiveness of professional interventions that alone, or in combination, are effective in promoting prudent antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients, to evaluate the impact of these interventions on reducing the incidence of antimicrobial resistant pathogens or CDAD and their impact on clinical outcome.
We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) specialized register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE from 1980 to November 2003. Additional studies were obtained from the bibliographies of retrieved articles
We included all randomised and controlled clinical trials (RCT/CCT), controlled before and after studies (CBA) and interrupted time series (ITS) studies of antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients. Interventions included any professional or structural interventions as defined by EPOC.
Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality.
Sixty six studies were included and 51 (77%) showed a significant improvement in at least one outcome. Six interventions only aimed to increase treatment, 57 interventions aimed to decrease treatment and three interventions aimed to both increase and decrease treatment. The intervention target was the decision to prescribe antibiotics (one study), timing of first dose (six studies), the regimen (drug, dosing interval etc, 61 studies) or the duration of treatment (10 studies); 12 studies had more than one target. Of the six interventions that aimed to increase treatment, five reported a significant improvement in drug outcomes and one a significant improvement in clinical outcome. Of the 60 interventions that aimed to decrease treatment 47 reported drug outcomes of which 38 (81%) significantly improved, 16 reported microbiological outcomes of which 12 (75%) significantly improved and nine reported clinical outcomes of which two (22%) significantly deteriorated and 3 (33%) significantly improved. Five studies aimed to reduce CDAD. Three showed a significant reduction in CDAD. Due to differences in study design and duration of follow up it was only possible to perform meta-regression on a few studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results show that interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients are successful, and can reduce antimicrobial resistance or hospital acquired infections.
医院中高达50%的抗生素使用是不恰当的。与抗生素敏感菌引起的感染相比,医院中由耐抗生素细菌引起的感染与更高的死亡率、发病率以及更长的住院时间相关。艰难梭菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)是一种由抗生素处方导致的医院获得性感染。
评估单独或联合使用的专业干预措施在促进对医院住院患者谨慎开具抗生素处方方面的有效性,评估这些干预措施对降低抗菌药物耐药病原体或CDAD发病率的影响及其对临床结局的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane有效实践与护理组织(EPOC)专门注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、MEDLINE、1980年至2003年11月的EMBASE。从检索到的文章参考文献中获取了其他研究。
我们纳入了所有针对医院住院患者抗生素处方的随机对照临床试验(RCT/CCT)、前后对照研究(CBA)和中断时间序列(ITS)研究。干预措施包括EPOC定义的任何专业或结构性干预措施。
两名评价员提取数据并评估质量。
纳入了66项研究,51项(77%)显示至少一项结局有显著改善。6项干预措施仅旨在增加治疗,57项干预措施旨在减少治疗,3项干预措施旨在同时增加和减少治疗。干预目标是开具抗生素的决定(1项研究)、首剂给药时间(6项研究)、治疗方案(药物、给药间隔等,61项研究)或治疗持续时间(10项研究);12项研究有多个目标。在旨在增加治疗的6项干预措施中,5项报告药物结局有显著改善,1项报告临床结局有显著改善。在旨在减少治疗的60项干预措施中,47项报告了药物结局,其中38项(81%)有显著改善,16项报告了微生物学结局,其中12项(75%)有显著改善,9项报告了临床结局,其中2项(22%)显著恶化,3项(33%)显著改善。5项研究旨在降低CDAD。3项显示CDAD显著降低。由于研究设计和随访持续时间的差异,仅能对少数研究进行meta回归。
结果表明,改善医院住院患者抗生素处方的干预措施是成功的,并且可以降低抗菌药物耐药性或医院获得性感染。