West C, Hesketh A, Vail A, Bowen A
Hope Hospital, Rehabilitation Services, Stott Lane, Salford, Manchester, UK M6 8HD.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD004298. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004298.pub2.
Apraxia of speech is a communication disorder that can affect stroke patients. Several different intervention strategies are undertaken by speech and language therapists working with this patient group.
To assess whether therapeutic interventions improve functional speech in stroke patients with apraxia of speech and which individual therapeutic interventions are effective.
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (searched May 2004). In addition, we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003); MEDLINE (1966 to April 2004); EMBASE (1980 to April 2004); CINAHL (1982 to April 2004); PsycINFO (1974 to April 2004); the National Research Register (searched April 2004); and Current Controlled Trials Register (searched May 2004). We reviewed reference lists of relevant articles and contacted authors and researchers in an effort to identify published and unpublished trials.
We sought to include randomised controlled trials of non-drug interventions for adults with apraxia of speech following a stroke where the primary outcome was functional speech at six months follow up.
One author searched the titles, abstracts and keywords. Two authors examined the abstracts that might meet the inclusion criteria. Four authors were available to assess trial quality and to extract data from eligible studies.
No trials were identified.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions for apraxia of speech. There is a need for high quality randomised trials to be undertaken in this area.
言语失用是一种可能影响中风患者的交流障碍。言语治疗师针对这一患者群体采用了几种不同的干预策略。
评估治疗性干预措施是否能改善中风后患有言语失用的患者的功能性言语,以及哪些个体治疗性干预措施是有效的。
我们检索了Cochrane中风组试验注册库(2004年5月检索)。此外,我们还检索了以下数据库:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2003年第4期);医学索引数据库(1966年至2004年4月);荷兰医学文摘数据库(1980年至2004年4月);护理学与健康领域数据库(1982年至2004年4月);心理学文摘数据库(1974年至2004年4月);国家研究注册库(2004年4月检索);以及当前对照试验注册库(2004年5月检索)。我们查阅了相关文章的参考文献列表,并联系了作者和研究人员,以识别已发表和未发表的试验。
我们试图纳入针对中风后患有言语失用的成年人的非药物干预的随机对照试验,其主要结局是随访6个月时的功能性言语。
一位作者检索标题、摘要和关键词。两位作者审查可能符合纳入标准的摘要。四位作者可用于评估试验质量并从符合条件的研究中提取数据。
未识别到试验。
随机试验没有证据支持或反驳言语失用治疗性干预措施的有效性。该领域需要开展高质量的随机试验。