作为一种监管手段的能力验证：美国病理学家协会的视角
Proficiency testing as a regulatory device: a CAP perspective.
作者信息
Hamlin W
机构信息
Laboratory of Pathology, Seattle, WA 98104.
出版信息
Clin Chem. 1992 Jul;38(7):1234-6; discussion 1245-50.
PMID:1623587
Abstract
The history and development of the proficiency testing programs of the College of American Pathologists are reviewed. Important considerations of external surveys include target value assignment and determination of acceptable ranges. "Blind" proficiency testing and on-site evaluation provide alternative methods of laboratory evaluation but are limited by practical logistics.
摘要
回顾了美国病理学家学会能力验证计划的历史与发展。外部调查的重要考量因素包括靶值设定和可接受范围的确定。“盲法”能力验证和现场评估提供了实验室评估的替代方法，但受实际后勤因素限制。
相似文献
1
Proficiency testing as a regulatory device: a CAP perspective.作为一种监管手段的能力验证：美国病理学家协会的视角
Clin Chem. 1992 Jul;38(7):1234-6; discussion 1245-50.
2
The history of proficiency testing/quality control.能力验证/质量控制的历史。
Clin Chem. 1992 Jul;38(7):1205-9; discussion 1218-25.
3
Limitations of proficiency testing under CLIA '67.《1967年临床实验室改进修正案》下能力验证的局限性。
Clin Chem. 1992 Jul;38(7):1237-44; discussion 1245-50.
4
Review of actual proficiency-testing performance under CLIA '67 (March 14, 1990) rules: perspective from the first year's data.根据《1967年临床实验室改进法案》（1990年3月14日）规则对实际能力验证表现的回顾：基于第一年数据的视角。
Clin Chem. 1992 Jul;38(7):1254-9; discussion 1268-72.
5
The history of evaluation criteria for CAP surveys.社区获得性肺炎（CAP）调查评估标准的历史。
Clin Chem. 1993 Jul;39(7):1456-7; discussion 1458-60.
6
Regulation of proficiency testing under the March 14 rule.3月14日规则下的能力验证监管
Clin Chem. 1992 Jul;38(7):1251-3; discussion 1268-72.
7
Proficiency testing from a total quality management perspective.从全面质量管理角度看能力验证
Clin Chem. 1992 May;38(5):615-8.
8
How good are clinical laboratories? An assessment of current performance.临床实验室的水平如何？当前绩效评估。
Clin Chem. 1992 Jul;38(7):1210-7; discussion 1218-25.
9
Proficiency testing in a medical-needs context.医疗需求背景下的能力验证。
Clin Chem. 1989 Mar;35(3):347-54.
10
Twenty-five years of proficiency testing for clinical laboratories.临床实验室25年的能力验证
Ann Clin Lab Sci (1971). 1972 Sep-Oct;2(5):420-4.
引用本文的文献
1
The regulatory landscape of precision oncology laboratory medicine in the United States - Perspective on the past 5 years and considerations for future regulation.美国精准肿瘤学检验医学的监管格局——过去5年的视角及未来监管考量
Pract Lab Med. 2020 Aug;21:e00172. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00172. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Evaluation of mycology laboratory proficiency testing.真菌学实验室能力验证评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jul;37(7):2297-305. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.7.2297-2305.1999.
Zotero 插件