Momeni Arash, Padron Nestor Torio, Föhn Matthias, Bannasch Holger, Borges Jörg, Ryu Seung-Min, Stark G Björn
Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79095, Freiburg i. Br, Germany.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;29(6):558-64. doi: 10.1007/s00266-005-0095-z.
Since its introduction, augmentation mammaplasty has gained widespread popularity, as demonstrated by the fact that an estimated 2 million women in the United States have received implants. During recent decades, several surgical approaches have evolved in terms of implant placement or site of access to the surgical plane. Debate has existed concerning the questionable superiority of a particular technique for achievement of optimal results. Thus, the inframammary approach, an established and widely accepted technique for breast augmentation, and endoscopically assisted transaxillary breast augmentation were retrospectively compared in terms of safety and aesthetic outcome, as measured, respectively, by the rate of postoperative complications and patient satisfaction.
This study analyzed 78 patients undergoing augmentation mammaplasty between 1997 and 2004. Only patients seeking primary augmentation mammaplasty solely for aesthetic reasons were included in the study. Previously performed breast surgery and simultaneously conducted ipsilateral mastopexy were among the exclusion criteria. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8) because of its easy applicability.
The complication rate was low in both patient subsets, thus confirming the safety of the transaxillary approach, as compared with the more common submammary technique. However, a higher level of satisfaction was detected in the former patient group, indicating a more favorable aesthetic outcome with the transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty.
Endoscopically assisted transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty is a safe method with predictable results associated with a high level of patient satisfaction. If applied in the setting of appropriate indications, it is an excellent tool for use with patients who prefer to have an incision at a distant site.
自隆乳术问世以来,其已广泛普及,据估计美国有200万女性接受了乳房植入物这一事实即可证明。近几十年来,在植入物放置或进入手术平面的部位方面,几种手术方法不断演变。对于哪种特定技术在实现最佳效果方面具有可疑的优越性一直存在争议。因此,对乳房下皱襞入路(一种成熟且被广泛接受的隆乳技术)和内镜辅助经腋窝隆乳术在安全性和美学效果方面进行了回顾性比较,分别通过术后并发症发生率和患者满意度来衡量。
本研究分析了1997年至2004年间接受隆乳术的78例患者。本研究仅纳入了仅出于美学原因寻求初次隆乳术的患者。既往进行过乳房手术以及同时进行同侧乳房上提术均在排除标准之列。由于其易于应用,使用客户满意度问卷(CSQ - 8)评估患者满意度。
两个患者亚组的并发症发生率均较低,从而证实了经腋窝入路与更常见的乳房下皱襞技术相比的安全性。然而,在前一组患者中检测到更高的满意度水平,表明经腋窝隆乳术具有更良好的美学效果。
内镜辅助经腋窝隆乳术是一种安全的方法,结果可预测,患者满意度高。如果应用于适当的适应症,它是用于那些希望在远处部位有切口的患者的一种优秀工具。