• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测创伤性脑损伤后预后的临床因素:一项前瞻性多中心递归分割(决策树)分析

Clinical elements that predict outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective multicenter recursive partitioning (decision-tree) analysis.

作者信息

Brown Allen W, Malec James F, McClelland Robyn L, Diehl Nancy N, Englander Jeffrey, Cifu David X

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2005 Oct;22(10):1040-51. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1040.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2005.22.1040
PMID:16238482
Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often presents clinicians with a complex combination of clinical elements that can confound treatment and make outcome prediction challenging. Predictive models have commonly used acute physiological variables and gross clinical measures to predict mortality and basic outcome endpoints. The primary goal of this study was to consider all clinical elements available concerning a survivor of TBI admitted for inpatient rehabilitation, and identify those factors that predict disability, need for supervision, and productive activity one year after injury. The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) database was used for decision tree analysis using recursive partitioning (n = 3463). Outcome measures included the Functional Independence Measure(), the Disability Rating Scale, the Supervision Rating Scale, and a measure of productive activity. Predictor variables included all physical examination elements, measures of injury severity (initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, duration of post-traumatic amnesia [PTA], length of coma, CT scan pathology), gender, age, and years of education. The duration of PTA, age, and most elements of the physical examination were predictive of early disability. The duration of PTA alone was selected to predict late disability and independent living. The duration of PTA, age, sitting balance, and limb strength were selected to predict productive activity at 1 year. The duration of PTA was the best predictor of outcome selected in this model for all endpoints and elements of the physical examination provided additional predictive value. Valid and reliable measures of PTA and physical impairment after TBI are important for accurate outcome prediction.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)常常给临床医生带来一系列复杂的临床症状,这些症状会干扰治疗并使预后预测变得困难。预测模型通常使用急性生理变量和粗略的临床指标来预测死亡率和基本的预后终点。本研究的主要目的是综合考虑所有与因住院康复而收治的TBI幸存者相关的临床因素,并确定那些能够预测受伤一年后残疾情况、监督需求和生产活动能力的因素。使用创伤性脑损伤模型系统(TBIMS)数据库进行递归划分的决策树分析(n = 3463)。结局指标包括功能独立性测量量表(FIM)、残疾评定量表、监督评定量表以及一项生产活动测量指标。预测变量包括所有体格检查项目、损伤严重程度指标(初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、创伤后遗忘症(PTA)持续时间、昏迷时长、CT扫描病理结果)、性别、年龄和受教育年限。PTA持续时间、年龄以及大多数体格检查项目可预测早期残疾情况。仅PTA持续时间被选用于预测晚期残疾和独立生活能力。PTA持续时间、年龄、坐位平衡和肢体力量被选用于预测1年后的生产活动能力。在该模型中,PTA持续时间是所有终点指标的最佳预后预测指标,体格检查项目提供了额外的预测价值。TBI后PTA和身体损伤的有效且可靠的测量指标对于准确的预后预测很重要。

相似文献

1
Clinical elements that predict outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective multicenter recursive partitioning (decision-tree) analysis.预测创伤性脑损伤后预后的临床因素:一项前瞻性多中心递归分割(决策树)分析
J Neurotrauma. 2005 Oct;22(10):1040-51. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1040.
2
Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up.脑损伤后长时间意识障碍的恢复自然史:1-4 年随访后住院康复患者的结局。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17707-5.
3
Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity: Glasgow Coma Scale, length of coma and post-traumatic amnesia.创伤性脑损伤严重程度指标的比较:格拉斯哥昏迷量表、昏迷时长和创伤后遗忘症。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;79(6):678-85. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.111187. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
4
Functional outcomes in traumatic disorders of consciousness: 5-year outcomes from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems.创伤性意识障碍的功能结果:国家残疾研究所和康复研究创伤性脑损伤模型系统的 5 年结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1855-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.041. Epub 2013 May 31.
5
Classification schema of posttraumatic amnesia duration-based injury severity relative to 1-year outcome: analysis of individuals with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.基于创伤后遗忘持续时间的损伤严重程度与1年预后相关的分类方案:对中度和重度创伤性脑损伤患者的分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jan;90(1):17-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.030.
6
Neuropsychological functioning in a national cohort of severe traumatic brain injury: demographic and acute injury-related predictors.全国严重创伤性脑损伤队列中的神经心理功能:人口统计学和急性损伤相关预测因素。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):E1-12. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000039.
7
Predictive utility of weekly post-traumatic amnesia assessments after brain injury: A multicentre analysis.
Brain Inj. 2010;24(3):472-8. doi: 10.3109/02699051003610466.
8
Utility of post-traumatic amnesia in predicting 1-year productivity following traumatic brain injury: comparison of the Russell and Mississippi PTA classification intervals.创伤性脑损伤后遗忘时间在预测 1 年生产力中的作用:Russell 和密西西比 PTA 分类间隔的比较。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 May;82(5):494-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.222489. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
9
Accuracy of self-reported length of coma and posttraumatic amnesia in persons with medically verified traumatic brain injury.经医学验证的创伤性脑损伤患者自我报告的昏迷时长和创伤后遗忘症的准确性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4):652-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.024. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Prospective comparison of acute confusion severity with duration of post-traumatic amnesia in predicting employment outcome after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后急性意识模糊严重程度与创伤后遗忘持续时间对就业结局预测的前瞻性比较
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;78(8):872-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.104190. Epub 2006 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
War zone veteran cognitive-related functional decline and posttraumatic stress symptoms: Relationship to intimate partner stress.战区退伍军人与认知相关的功能衰退及创伤后应激症状:与亲密伴侣压力的关系。
Psychol Trauma. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1037/tra0002035.
2
The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Systematic Review of Clinical Factors Associated with Outcomes in People with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.澳大利亚创伤性脑损伤倡议:对中重度创伤性脑损伤患者预后相关临床因素的系统评价。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2024 Jul 4;5(1):0. doi: 10.1089/neur.2023.0111. eCollection 2024.
3
Predictors of outcomes 3 to 12 months after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
创伤性脑损伤后3至12个月预后的预测因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2024 Feb;15(1):3-17. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0288. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Integrating unsupervised and supervised learning techniques to predict traumatic brain injury: A population-based study.整合无监督和监督学习技术以预测创伤性脑损伤:一项基于人群的研究。
Intell Based Med. 2023;8. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmed.2023.100118. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
5
Fluid-Based Protein Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: The View from the Bedside.基于液体的创伤性脑损伤蛋白生物标志物:来自床边的观察。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 13;24(22):16267. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216267.
6
Time from injury and age interact in relationship with perceived quality of life outcomes following vocation-focused neuropsychological rehabilitation.受伤后的时间与年龄相互作用,影响以职业为重点的神经心理康复后所感知到的生活质量结果。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;14:1047615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1047615. eCollection 2023.
7
Assessment of the individual and compounding effects of marginalization factors on injury severity, discharge location, recovery, and employment outcomes at 1 year after traumatic brain injury.评估脑外伤后1年时边缘化因素对损伤严重程度、出院地点、康复及就业结局的个体及综合影响。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 26;13:942001. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.942001. eCollection 2022.
8
Relationship between post-traumatic amnesia and white matter integrity in traumatic brain injury using tract-based spatial statistics.基于弥散张量成像的创伤性脑损伤后遗忘时间与脑白质完整性的关系
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 25;11(1):6898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86439-0.
9
Predictive Value of Midsagittal Tissue Bridges on Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤后中矢状组织桥对功能恢复的预测价值。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Jan;35(1):33-43. doi: 10.1177/1545968320971787. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
10
Tissue bridges predict neuropathic pain emergence after spinal cord injury.组织桥预测脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛的发生。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;91(10):1111-1117. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323150. Epub 2020 Aug 11.