• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估脑外伤后1年时边缘化因素对损伤严重程度、出院地点、康复及就业结局的个体及综合影响。

Assessment of the individual and compounding effects of marginalization factors on injury severity, discharge location, recovery, and employment outcomes at 1 year after traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Garduño-Ortega Olga, Li Huihui, Smith Michelle, Yao Lanqiu, Wilson Judith, Zarate Alejandro, Bushnik Tamara

机构信息

Research Department, Rusk Rehabilitation, Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.

Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 26;13:942001. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.942001. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.942001
PMID:36090882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9462705/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of eight distinct marginalized group memberships and explore their compounding effect on injury severity, recovery, discharge location, and employment outcomes 1-year after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

Individuals with medically confirmed, complicated mild-severe TBI (N = 300) requiring inpatient rehabilitation care between the ages of 18 and 65 were recruited at two urban (public and private) health systems between 2013 and 2019. Data were collected from self-report and medical record abstraction. Marginalized group membership (MGM) includes racial and ethnic minority status, less than a high school diploma/GED, limited English proficiency, substance abuse, homelessness, psychiatric hospitalizations, psychiatric disorders, and incarceration history. Membership in four or more of these groups signifies high MGM. In addition, these factors were explored individually. Unadjusted and adjusted linear and logistic regressions and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess the associations of interest in RStudio.

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, sex, and cause of injury, compared to TBI patients with low MGM, those with high MGM experience significantly longer post-traumatic amnesia (95% CI = 2.70, 16.50; = 0.007) and are significantly more likely to have a severe TBI (per the Glasgow-Coma Scale) (95% CI = 1.70, 6.10; ≤ 0.001) than a complicated mild-moderate injury. Individuals with high MGM also are significantly less likely to be engaged in competitive paid employment 1 year after injury (95% CI = 2.40, 23.40; = 0.001). Patients with high MGM are less likely to be discharged to the community compared to patients with low MGM, but this association was not significant (95% CI = 0.36, 1.16; = 0.141). However, when assessing MGMs in isolation, certain associations were not significant in unadjusted or adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory study's findings reveal that when four or more marginalization factors intersect, there is a compounding negative association with TBI severity, recovery, and employment outcomes. No significant association was found between high MGM and discharge location. When studied separately, individual MGMs had varying effects. Studying marginalization factors affecting individuals with TBI has critical clinical and social implications. These findings underline the importance of addressing multidimensional factors concurrent with TBI recovery, as the long-term effects of TBI can place additional burdens on individuals and their economic stability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨八种不同的边缘化群体身份的影响,并探究其对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后1年的损伤严重程度、恢复情况、出院地点和就业结果的复合影响。

方法

2013年至2019年期间,在两个城市(公立和私立)卫生系统招募了年龄在18至65岁之间、经医学确认患有复杂轻至重度TBI(N = 300)且需要住院康复护理的个体。数据通过自我报告和病历摘要收集。边缘化群体身份(MGM)包括种族和族裔少数群体身份、高中文凭/普通教育发展证书以下、英语水平有限、药物滥用、无家可归、精神病住院史、精神疾病和监禁史。属于四个或更多这些群体表示高MGM。此外,还对这些因素进行了单独探究。在RStudio中使用未调整和调整后的线性及逻辑回归以及Kruskal-Wallis检验来评估感兴趣的关联。

结果

在调整年龄、性别和损伤原因后,与低MGM的TBI患者相比,高MGM的患者创伤后遗忘时间显著更长(95%置信区间 = 2.70,16.50;P = 0.007),并且与复杂的轻至中度损伤相比,更有可能患有重度TBI(根据格拉斯哥昏迷量表)(95%置信区间 = 1.70,6.10;P ≤ 0.001)。高MGM的个体在受伤1年后从事有竞争力的带薪工作的可能性也显著更低(95%置信区间 = 2.40,23.40;P = 0.001)。与低MGM的患者相比,高MGM的患者出院回到社区的可能性更低,但这种关联不显著(95%置信区间 = 0.36,1.16;P = 0.141)。然而,在单独评估MGM时,某些关联在未调整或调整后的模型中并不显著。

结论

这项探索性研究的结果表明,当四个或更多边缘化因素相互交织时,与TBI严重程度、恢复情况和就业结果存在复合负相关。未发现高MGM与出院地点之间存在显著关联。单独研究时,个体MGM的影响各不相同。研究影响TBI患者的边缘化因素具有关键的临床和社会意义。这些发现强调了在TBI恢复过程中同时解决多维度因素的重要性,因为TBI的长期影响可能给个体及其经济稳定性带来额外负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7431/9462705/2ea0e2c627f2/fneur-13-942001-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7431/9462705/2ea0e2c627f2/fneur-13-942001-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7431/9462705/2ea0e2c627f2/fneur-13-942001-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the individual and compounding effects of marginalization factors on injury severity, discharge location, recovery, and employment outcomes at 1 year after traumatic brain injury.评估脑外伤后1年时边缘化因素对损伤严重程度、出院地点、康复及就业结局的个体及综合影响。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 26;13:942001. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.942001. eCollection 2022.
2
Recovery of Consciousness and Functional Outcome in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.意识恢复和中重度创伤性脑损伤的功能预后。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 May 1;78(5):548-557. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0084.
3
A prospective study on employment outcome 3 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤后 3 年的就业结果前瞻性研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):993-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
4
Prosodic processing post traumatic brain injury - a systematic review.创伤性脑损伤后的韵律加工——一项系统综述
Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0385-3.
5
Recovery at one year following isolated traumatic brain injury: a Western Trauma Association prospective multicenter trial.孤立性创伤性脑损伤后一年的恢复情况:一项西部创伤协会前瞻性多中心试验。
J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1298-304; discussion 1304. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196002.03681.18.
6
Prior traumatic brain injury is a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI cohort study.既往创伤性脑损伤是中重度创伤性脑损伤患者院内死亡的一个危险因素:一项TRACK-TBI队列研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jul 24;9(1):e001501. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001501. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring Serum Biomarkers for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury探索轻度创伤性脑损伤的血清生物标志物
8
The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial.年龄对轻度创伤性脑损伤功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性多中心试验的6个月报告。
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000127767.83267.33.
9
Combat TBI: History, Epidemiology, and Injury Modes战斗性创伤性脑损伤:历史、流行病学及损伤方式
10
The influence of minority status on job stability after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后少数群体身份对工作稳定性的影响。
PM R. 2009 Jan;1(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Using machine learning to discover traumatic brain injury patient phenotypes: national concussion surveillance system Pilot.利用机器学习发现创伤性脑损伤患者表型:国家脑震荡监测系统试点项目
Brain Inj. 2024 Sep 18;38(11):880-888. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Racial/Ethnic and Geographic Disparities in Comorbid Traumatic Brain Injury-Renal Failure in US Veterans and Associated Veterans Affairs Resource Costs, 2000-2020.2000-2020 年美国退伍军人创伤性脑损伤-肾衰竭合并症的种族/民族和地理差异及相关退伍军人事务资源成本
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Apr;11(2):652-668. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01550-4. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Intersectionality in quantitative health disparities research: A systematic review of challenges and limitations in empirical studies.定量健康差异研究中的交叉性:实证研究中挑战与局限的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113876. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113876. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Inpatient rehabilitation facility discharge destination among younger adults with traumatic brain injury: differences by race and ethnicity.创伤性脑损伤的年轻成年人住院康复机构出院去向:按种族和民族的差异。
Brain Inj. 2021 May 12;35(6):661-674. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1895317. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
3
Racial and Ethnic Disparities Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury Across the Continuum of Care: a Narrative Review and Directions for Future Research.
贯穿整个护理过程中与创伤性脑损伤相关的种族和族裔差异:一项叙述性综述及未来研究方向
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Jun;9(3):786-799. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01017-4. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Primary Language and Participation Outcomes in Hispanics With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study.西班牙裔创伤性脑损伤患者的主要语言和参与结果:创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(4):E218-E225. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000655.
5
Integrated care pathways for Black persons with traumatic brain injury: a protocol for a critical transdisciplinary scoping review.创伤性脑损伤的黑人综合护理路径:一项批判性跨学科范围综述的方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 1;9(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01323-8.
6
Longitudinal Effects of Medical Comorbidities on Functional Outcome and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury: An Individual Growth Curve Analysis of NIDILRR Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Data.医疗共病对创伤性脑损伤后功能结局和生活满意度的纵向影响:NIDILRR 创伤性脑损伤模型系统数据的个体增长曲线分析。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 Sep/Oct;34(5):E24-E35. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000459.
7
Impact of racial-ethnic minority status and systemic vulnerabilities on time to acute TBI rehabilitation admission in an urban public hospital setting.在城市公立医院环境中,种族少数民族地位和系统脆弱性对急性创伤性脑损伤康复入院时间的影响。
Rehabil Psychol. 2019 May;64(2):229-236. doi: 10.1037/rep0000260. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Marginalization: Conceptualizing patient vulnerabilities in the framework of social determinants of health-An integrative review.边缘化:在健康的社会决定因素框架中对患者脆弱性进行概念化——一项综合综述。
Nurs Inq. 2019 Jan;26(1):e12268. doi: 10.1111/nin.12268. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
9
Predictors of Discharge Destination From Acute Care in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.创伤性脑损伤患者急性护理出院去向的预测因素:系统评价。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):52-64. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000403.
10
Predicting Long-Term Global Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development of a Practical Prognostic Tool Using the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database.预测创伤性脑损伤后的长期全球预后:使用创伤性脑损伤模型系统国家数据库开发实用预后工具。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jul 15;35(14):1587-1595. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5359. Epub 2018 May 16.