Halpern Ethan J, Ramey John R, Strup Stephen E, Frauscher Ferdinand, McCue Peter, Gomella Leonard G
Department of Radiology, Jefferson Prostate Diagnostic Center, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-5244, USA.
Cancer. 2005 Dec 1;104(11):2373-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21440.
The purpose of this study was to assess prostate carcinoma detection and discrimination of benign from malignant prostate tissue with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
In all, 301 subjects referred for prostate biopsy were evaluated with contrast-enhanced sonography using continuous harmonic imaging (CHI) and intermittent harmonic imaging (IHI) with interscan delay times of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 seconds, as well as continuous color and power Doppler. Targeted biopsy cores were obtained from sites of greatest enhancement, followed by spatially distributed cores in a modified sextant distribution.
Carcinoma was detected in 363 biopsy cores from 104 of 301 subjects (35%). Carcinoma was found in 15.5% (175 of 1133) of targeted cores and 10.4% (188 of 1806) of sextant cores (P < 0.01). Among subjects with carcinoma, targeted cores were twice as likely to be positive (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, P < 0.001). Clustered receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of imaging findings at sextant biopsy sites yielded the following Az values: precontrast gray scale: 0.58; precontrast color Doppler: 0.53; precontrast power Doppler: 0.58; CHI: 0.62; IHI (0.2 sec): 0.64; IHI (0.5 sec): 0.63; IHI (1.0 sec): 0.65; IHI (2.0 sec): 0.61; contrast-enhanced color Doppler: 0.60; contrast-enhanced power Doppler: 0.62. A statistically significant benefit was found for IHI over baseline imaging (P < 0.05).
The carcinoma detection rate of contrast-enhanced targeted cores is significantly higher when compared with sextant cores. Contrast-enhanced transrectal sonography with IHI provides a statistically significant improvement in discrimination between benign and malignant biopsy sites. However, given the relatively low ROC areas, this technique may not be sufficient to predict which patients have benign versus malignant disease.
本研究旨在评估经超声造影检测前列腺癌以及鉴别前列腺良恶性组织的能力。
共有301例因前列腺活检前来就诊的患者接受了超声造影检查,采用连续谐波成像(CHI)和间歇谐波成像(IHI),其帧间延迟时间分别为0.2、0.5、1.0、2.0秒,同时还进行了连续彩色及能量多普勒检查。在增强最明显的部位获取靶向活检组织条,随后按照改良的六分区法在其他部位获取组织条。
在301例患者中,104例(35%)的363条活检组织条检测到癌。靶向活检组织条中癌的检出率为15.5%(1133条中的175条),六分区活检组织条中癌的检出率为10.4%(1806条中的188条)(P<0.01)。在患有前列腺癌的患者中,靶向活检组织条呈阳性的可能性是六分区活检组织条的两倍(优势比[OR]=2.0,P<0.001)。对六分区活检部位的影像学表现进行聚类受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,得到以下Az值:造影前灰阶:0.58;造影前彩色多普勒:0.53;造影前能量多普勒:0.58;CHI:0.62;IHI(0.2秒):0.64;IHI(0.5秒):0.63;IHI(1.0秒):0.65;IHI(2.0秒):0.61;超声造影彩色多普勒:0.60;超声造影能量多普勒:0.62。与基线成像相比,IHI具有显著的统计学优势(P<0.05)。
与六分区活检组织条相比,超声造影靶向活检组织条的癌检出率显著更高。经直肠超声造影联合IHI在鉴别良性和恶性活检部位方面具有显著的统计学改善。然而,鉴于ROC曲线下面积相对较低,该技术可能不足以预测哪些患者患有良性或恶性疾病。