Suppr超能文献

昏迷创伤患者中已检测出和被忽视的颈椎损伤:来自宾夕法尼亚创伤结局研究

Detected and overlooked cervical spine injury among comatose trauma patients: from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study.

作者信息

Piatt Joseph H

机构信息

St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Oct 15;19(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/foc.2005.19.4.7.

Abstract

OBJECT

A rule for identifying patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who are at exceptionally low risk of cervical spine injury might be clinically useful. The goal in this study was to research case records to determine whether such a rule would be practicable.

METHODS

The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study database was used to find patients with TBI in whom Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores at admission were 8 or less. Cases of cervical spine injury were identified from diagnostic codes. Associations between these injuries and a variety of clinical variables were tested using chi-square analysis. The probability of a cervical spine injury in these patients was modeled by logistic regression. Decision tree models were constructed and statistical determinants of overlooked cervical spine injury were examined. The prevalence of cervical spine injury among 41,142 cases of TBI was 8%. The mechanism of injury, presence of thoracolumbosacral (TLS) spinal, limb and/or facial fracture, patient age, GCS score at admission, and the presence of hypotension were all factors associated with cervical spine injury. These were incorporated into the following logistic regression model: probability of cervical spine injury = 1/(1 + exp[4.030 - 0.417mechanism - 0.264age - 0.678TLS - 0.299limb + 0.218GCS score - 0.231hypotension - 0.157*facial]). This model yielded a rule for clearance of 28% of cases, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%. Decision tree analysis yielded an easily stated rule for clearance of 24% of cases, with an NPV of 98.2%. The prevalence of overlooked cervical spine injury among all patients with severe TBI was 0.3%; the prevalence of overlooked cervical spine injury among patients in whom it was later diagnosed was 3.9%. Overlooked cervical spine injury was less common among patients with associated TLS fractures (odds ratio 0.453, 95% confidence interval 0.245-0.837).

CONCLUSIONS

No acceptable rule for relaxation of vigilance in the search for cervical spine injury among patients with severe TBI has been identified. Levels of provider vigilance and consequent rates of overlooked cervical spine injury can be affected by environmental cues and presumably by other behavioral and organizational factors.

摘要

目的

制定一项用于识别颈椎损伤风险极低的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的规则可能具有临床实用性。本研究的目的是查阅病例记录,以确定这样的规则是否可行。

方法

利用宾夕法尼亚创伤结局研究数据库查找入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤8分的TBI患者。通过诊断编码确定颈椎损伤病例。使用卡方分析检验这些损伤与各种临床变量之间的关联。通过逻辑回归对这些患者颈椎损伤的概率进行建模。构建决策树模型并检查漏诊颈椎损伤的统计决定因素。在41142例TBI病例中,颈椎损伤的患病率为8%。损伤机制、胸腰段脊柱(TLS)、四肢和/或面部骨折的存在、患者年龄、入院时的GCS评分以及低血压的存在均为与颈椎损伤相关的因素。将这些因素纳入以下逻辑回归模型:颈椎损伤概率 = 1 / (1 + exp[4.030 - 0.417×损伤机制 - 0.264×年龄 - 0.678×TLS - 0.299×四肢 + 0.218×GCS评分 - 0.231×低血压 - 0.157×面部])。该模型得出了一项可排除28%病例的规则,阴性预测值(NPV)为97%。决策树分析得出了一项易于表述的可排除24%病例的规则,NPV为98.2%。在所有重度TBI患者中,漏诊颈椎损伤的患病率为0.3%;在后来被诊断出颈椎损伤的患者中,漏诊颈椎损伤的患病率为3.9%。在伴有TLS骨折的患者中,漏诊颈椎损伤的情况较少见(比值比0.453,95%置信区间0.245 - 0.837)。

结论

尚未确定在重度TBI患者中寻找颈椎损伤时放松警惕的可接受规则。医疗人员的警惕程度以及随之而来的漏诊颈椎损伤率可能会受到环境线索以及其他行为和组织因素的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验