Williams J, Jehle D, Cottington E, Shufflebarger C
Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Medical College of Pennsylvania.
Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Jun;21(6):719-22. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82786-6.
The American College of Surgeons teaches that "trauma occurring above the clavicle should raise a high suspicion for a potential cervical spine injury." In this study, we investigated the association of head, facial, and clavicular trauma with cervical-spine and cord injury.
The records of 5,021 consecutive trauma patients admitted to a level I regional trauma center during a three and one-half year period were reviewed retrospectively. The incidence rates of head, facial, clavicle, cervical spine, and cervical cord injuries were recorded. Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS) were obtained on all patients. Statistical analysis using multiple logistic regression and chi 2 analysis were performed to determine the relationship between traumatic injury above the clavicle and cervical spine and cord injury.
Head-injured patients had no greater incidence of cervical-spine injury than did non-head-injured patients (4.76% vs 4.37%, P = .52) but were found to have significantly fewer spinal cord injuries (1.5% vs 2.3%, P = .048). There was no difference in incidence of cervical-spine injuries between patients with and those without facial injuries (4.2% vs 4.6%, P = .61). However, there were significantly fewer cord injuries among patients with facial injuries (0.75% vs 2.2%, P = .01). The presence or absence of clavicular fracture was not associated with a significant increase in cervical spine (6.9% vs 4.4%, P = 11) or cervical cord injuries (1.6% vs 2.0%, P = .68). A GCS of less than 14 was associated with a higher incidence of cervical-spine injury than was a GCS of 14 or more in both head-injured (6.7% vs 3.9%, P = .007) and non-head-injured patients (12.2% vs 5.9%, P = .002). There was a greater incidence of cervical cord injury among patients with a GCS of less than 14 than in those with a GCS of 14 or more in both the head-injured (2.2% vs 1.2%, P = .09) and non-head-injured (8.8% vs 2.7%, P less than .0001) groups.
Trauma to the head, face, and clavicle is not associated with a higher incidence of cervical-spine or cord injury. Physiologic parameters such as the GCS appear to be more accurate predictors of cervical spine or cord injury than mere evidence of trauma occurring above the clavicle.
美国外科医师学会指出,“锁骨以上部位发生的创伤应高度怀疑可能存在颈椎损伤”。在本研究中,我们调查了头部、面部和锁骨创伤与颈椎及脊髓损伤之间的关联。
回顾性分析了一家一级区域创伤中心在三年半时间内收治的5021例连续创伤患者的病历。记录头部、面部、锁骨、颈椎和颈髓损伤的发生率。对所有患者进行格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)。采用多元逻辑回归和卡方分析进行统计分析,以确定锁骨以上创伤与颈椎及脊髓损伤之间的关系。
头部受伤患者的颈椎损伤发生率并不高于未头部受伤患者(4.76%对4.37%,P = 0.52),但发现脊髓损伤明显较少(1.5%对2.3%,P = 0.048)。有面部损伤和无面部损伤患者的颈椎损伤发生率无差异(4.2%对4.6%,P = 0.61)。然而,面部损伤患者的脊髓损伤明显较少(0.75%对2.2%,P = 0.01)。锁骨骨折的有无与颈椎损伤(6.9%对4.4%,P = 0.11)或颈髓损伤(1.6%对2.0%,P = 0.68)的显著增加无关。在头部受伤患者(6.7%对3.9%,P = 0.007)和未头部受伤患者(12.2%对5.9%,P = 0.002)中,GCS小于14的患者颈椎损伤发生率均高于GCS为14或更高的患者。在头部受伤患者(2.2%对1.2%,P = 0.09)和未头部受伤患者(8.8%对2.7%,P小于0.0001)中,GCS小于14的患者颈髓损伤发生率均高于GCS为14或更高的患者。
头部、面部和锁骨创伤与颈椎或脊髓损伤的发生率较高无关。生理参数如GCS似乎比仅锁骨以上创伤的证据更能准确预测颈椎或脊髓损伤。