Netuveli Gopalakrishnan, Hurwitz Brian, Sheikh Aziz
Department of Primary Care & Social Medicine, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.
Respir Res. 2005 Oct 21;6(1):120. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-120.
Recent studies have demonstrated marked international variations in the prevalence of asthma, but less is known about ethnic variations in asthma epidemiology within individual countries and in particular the impact of migration on risk of developing asthma. Recent within country comparisons have however revealed that despite originating from areas of the world with a low risk for developing asthma, South Asian and Afro-Caribbean people in the UK are significantly (3x and 2x respectively) more likely to be admitted to hospital for asthma related problems than Whites.
Using data from the Fourth National Study of Morbidity Statistics in General Practice, a one-percent broadly representative prospective cohort study of consultations in general practice, we investigated ethnic variations in incident asthma consultations (defined as new or first consultations), and compared consultation rates between those born inside and outside the UK (migrant status). Logistic regression models were used to examine the combined effects of ethnicity and migration on asthma incident consultations.
Results showed significantly lower new/first asthma consultation rates for Whites than for each of the ethnic minority groups studied (mean age-adjusted consultation rates per 1000 patient-years: Whites 26.4 (95%CI 26.4, 26.4); South Asians 30.4 (95%CI 30.3, 30.5); Afro-Caribbeans 35.1 (95%CI 34.9, 35.3); and Others 27.8 (27.7, 28.0). Within each of these ethnic groups, those born outside of the UK showed consistently lower rates of incident asthma consultations. Modelling the combined effects of ethnic and migrant status revealed that UK-born South Asians and Afro-Caribbeans experienced comparable risks for incident GP consultations for asthma to UK-born Whites. Non-UK born Whites however experienced reduced risks (adjusted OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.69, 0.97) whilst non-UK born South Asians experienced increased risks (adjusted OR 1.33, 95%CI 1.04, 1.70) compared to UK-born Whites.
These findings strongly suggest that ethnicity and migration have significant and independent effects on asthma incidence. The known poorer asthma outcomes in UK South Asians and Afro-Caribbeans may in part be explained by the offspring of migrants experiencing an increased risk of developing asthma when compared to UK-born Whites. This is the first study to find heterogeneity for incident asthma consultations in Whites by migrant status.
近期研究表明哮喘患病率在国际上存在显著差异,但对于单个国家内哮喘流行病学的种族差异,尤其是移民对患哮喘风险的影响,我们了解得较少。然而,近期国内的比较研究显示,尽管英国的南亚裔和非洲加勒比裔人群来自世界上哮喘发病风险较低的地区,但他们因哮喘相关问题住院的可能性分别比白人高出3倍和2倍。
利用第四次全国全科医疗发病率统计研究的数据,这是一项对全科医疗咨询进行的具有广泛代表性的1%前瞻性队列研究,我们调查了哮喘初诊咨询(定义为新的或首次咨询)中的种族差异,并比较了在英国境内和境外出生者(移民身份)的咨询率。使用逻辑回归模型来检验种族和移民对哮喘初诊咨询的综合影响。
结果显示,白人的新/首次哮喘咨询率显著低于所研究的每个少数族裔群体(每1000患者年的年龄调整平均咨询率:白人26.4(95%置信区间26.4, 26.4);南亚裔30.4(95%置信区间30.3, 30.5);非洲加勒比裔35.1(95%置信区间34.9, 35.3);其他族裔27.8(27.7, 28.0)。在这些族裔群体中,在英国境外出生的人哮喘初诊咨询率始终较低。对种族和移民身份的综合影响进行建模显示,在英国出生的南亚裔和非洲加勒比裔人群因哮喘进行全科医疗咨询的风险与在英国出生的白人相当。然而,与在英国出生的白人相比,在英国境外出生的白人风险降低(调整后的比值比为0.82,95%置信区间0.69, 0.97),而在英国境外出生的南亚裔风险增加(调整后的比值比为1.33,95%置信区间1.04, 1.70)。
这些发现有力地表明,种族和移民对哮喘发病率有显著且独立的影响。英国南亚裔和非洲加勒比裔人群已知较差的哮喘治疗结果,部分原因可能是与在英国出生的白人相比,移民后代患哮喘的风险增加。这是第一项发现白人因移民身份在哮喘初诊咨询方面存在异质性的研究。